Probably, but the expression you used was hardly comparable; words like that will be exactly what the RFL will be looking for on Sunday.

Someone probably just saved you from yourself.

and i bought some "soap on a rope special like !"

Which one the "sheep one" or the one relating to" someone who works in a fudge packing plant"



You can call people - baldy,fatty,skinny,ginner,carrott top,geek,freak,nerd and turd.But the moment the word used refers to their sexuality all hell breaks lose.

I tell you the worlds gone PC mad!!!!

Or maybe there is just no need to do it??!

Or maybe people should just lighten up.

Well let he is without sin cast the first stone.

They will be easy to spot, if they are not wearing a Wakey top it is them as I am sure there will be no Wales fans

Wanna bet on it?


Looking forward to my visit to Wakey again this year, closest thing to remind me of the Brewery Field now we're in Wrexham!!

You can do all sorts of things; doesn't mean that you should.

Now now lets not start looking down the old nose at us

There was an incident at the Cas wakey game in the corner by the old scoreboards, several stewards came fyling out of knowhere and apparently someone was ejected.

Once there was an education "official" who came into our school to monitor classroom behaviour and halfway through the deathly quiet lesson I told my mate a joke and he laughed, annoyed the teacher made us both stand at the front of the class and share the joke with the whole room...

But thats my point,its socially acceptable for people to call someone "fatty" or "baldy" and hundreds of other names.But soon as it involves someones sexuality,everyone starts climbing on their high horse.

Like i said earlier,let he who is without sin ,cast the first stone.

Leave me out of this please.

I fall into the fatty and baldy categories as well.

ah well there was that case with the guy and the bricks!

Too much info me thinks

ah but alan, to fit with the theme of this thred if the person in question had have played rugby for castleford, would we been able to ridicule him because of his equineist sexual preferences????, cor look at the hoofs on that baby etc etc!

no we would have ridiculed him cos he was short and had to have a pile of bricks to do it!

Are you Paul King?

to be fair, those hard asses make a real difference to the level of abuse that is thrown. I cant believe we ever managed without em

I see no reason why we can't give Thomas some stick - he made his choices in life and if he can't cope with the outcome then that is his worry - he chose to play union and I would give the same stick to any union player.

As if

Presumably you also think it's would be acceptable to call Gareth Raynor on the other wing a 'n*gger' then.

crowt123 would deem that acceptable