I just wondered why we looked incessantly at the Chev Walker incident and the Elliot Whitehead knock on in the build up to another disallowed try, yet the Leuluai try was looked at just a couple of times and was rubber stamped almost instantly, could there be a case for a time limit on the video review? My biggest gripe is the total inconsistency with the decision making by the video ref. Sometimes he keeps looking for a reason to disallow until he thinks he's found one, and other times he seems to just glance at the tape so his coffee doesn't go cold.

Klein should have had 2 plums deducted

It is. But being rewarded with 2 of your opposition's competition points is also harsh on them.

we "cheated" in 2005 by breaching the salary cap, not by playing Morley. If you can prove that signing Morley put us over the salary cap then you're a better accountant that the one the bulls used in 2005.

As mentioned previously, he also took Lynch's place in the squad that played in the final. Where is Rob Parker compared to Lynch nowadays? I know which player I would rather have too. Are you really trying to tell us that if Leeds were to sign a better player than someone currently in the squad and it meant the Leeds player had to lose his playing registration to complete the new signing you wouldn't condone it?

He can't prove it, because it's impossible. I know exactly what put us over the cap that year and it wasn't the loan signing of Morley. But then, that doesn't suit his argument. Much like how all other cheating is ignored because it doesn't suit the argument.