icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpgYour job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.:icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpg
Quote: wrencat1873 "What I find a little strange is that, although the small local businesses need their regular customers, who may be those who work in town and city centres, with the importance of getting kids back to school, it would be more sensible to leave people working from home until the schools are "bedded back in".
This will help stress on public transport and also help ensure that we dont have to back track on schools.
Trying to get schools back, everyone back in their usual place of work, eating out etc, all at the same time is surely going to see cases rise and with so many towns and cities (especially up North) getting close to hitting new restrictions, "we" seem to be turning the tap to full, instead of increasing the flow at a sensible level.
It seems that there is genuine panic starting to set in over the economy but, if we move too quickly, we will end up going backwards instead of forward.'"
How long do you bed in schools - 3 months? if it takes that long most small businesses will be really suffering and as the furlough scheme will be ending we will see significant increases in unemployment. London looks to be in a terrible state - no doubt Mr Khan will be deflecting blame as usual!!
Do you extend the furlough on a 50/50 basis especially for certain industries e.g. travel, theatres etc?
We have relaxed the rules plenty and we haven't see a huge spike in infections/deaths?
The government cannot employ everyone - something has to happen and risks have to be taken if we are to avoid a huge impact on the economy
Quote: Sal Paradise "How long do you bed in schools - 3 months? if it takes that long most small businesses will be really suffering and as the furlough scheme will be ending we will see significant increases in unemployment. London looks to be in a terrible state - no doubt Mr Khan will be deflecting blame as usual!!
Do you extend the furlough on a 50/50 basis especially for certain industries e.g. travel, theatres etc?
We have relaxed the rules plenty and we haven't see a huge spike in infections/deaths?
The government cannot employ everyone - something has to happen and risks have to be taken if we are to avoid a huge impact on the economy'"
OK, tap on full it is then ??
You do remember the "R" number and if it gets pat one there is a problem ?
If we are saying this no longer applies then what the hell were the last 5 months all about.
I haven't advocated extending furlough,, merely suggested that while getting schools open, with the increase in traffic, movement of people and contact, perhaps it would be wise to leave those who can work effectively from home, working at home and for clarity, probably for 3/4 weeks not Infinium.
Of course there is a balance to be struck but, we've already had parts of West Yorkshire, greater Manchester and Leicester back on partial lockdown and that was without the movement/contact that will happen with schools fully open.
icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpgYour job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.:icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpg
You do remember the "R" number and if it gets pat one there is a problem ?
If we are saying this no longer applies then what the hell were the last 5 months all about.
I haven't advocated extending furlough,, merely suggested that while getting schools open, with the increase in traffic, movement of people and contact, perhaps it would be wise to leave those who can work effectively from home, working at home and for clarity, probably for 3/4 weeks not Infinium.
Of course there is a balance to be struck but, we've already had parts of West Yorkshire, greater Manchester and Leicester back on partial lockdown and that was without the movement/contact that will happen with schools fully open.'"
What I am saying is lockdown hasn't existed for 2 months at least and the infection rate and R rate hasn't increased in fact the opposite.
I never said you suggested extending the furlough - that was my suggestion. The last 5 months was about one thing and one thing only - protecting the NHS - there were news shows showing people in Italy in corridors and the government got scared because the NHS was such a pivotal topic in the GE everything was abandoned to protect it - wrongly in my view. We built used Nightingale hospitals everywhere but did nothing about educating children - why couldn't we have built Nightingale schools?
Exams should have gone ahead but the fixation with the NHS blinded this government.
The outbreaks in the areas you mentioned are a cultural issue with one small sector of society - again like the NHS the Islam is an issue that the government don't seem to want to tackle - sweatshops in Leicester, multi-generational housing and mixing etc. Don't see many outbreaks in other densely populated areas with differing cultural mixes?
Quote: Sal Paradise "What I am saying is lockdown hasn't existed for 2 months at least and the infection rate and R rate hasn't increased in fact the opposite.
I never said you suggested extending the furlough - that was my suggestion. The last 5 months was about one thing and one thing only - protecting the NHS - there were news shows showing people in Italy in corridors and the government got scared because the NHS was such a pivotal topic in the GE everything was abandoned to protect it - wrongly in my view. We built used Nightingale hospitals everywhere but did nothing about educating children - why couldn't we have built Nightingale schools?
Exams should have gone ahead but the fixation with the NHS blinded this government.
The outbreaks in the areas you mentioned are a cultural issue with one small sector of society - again like the NHS the Islam is an issue that the government don't seem to want to tackle - sweatshops in Leicester, multi-generational housing and mixing etc. Don't see many outbreaks in other densely populated areas with differing cultural mixes?'"
Absolutely agree regarding exams, even if it had meant moving them back (a little).
You may be right about the outbreaks but, I'm not privy to the precise information so, wouldn't want to make those generalisations.
As for the R number, your wrong.
It has been increasing (slightly) over the last couple of months and is currently said to be between 0.9 and 1.1.
We are right on the line, hence my comments about how quickly the tap is being turned on.
For me, it's better to give schools those couple of weeks and try to ensure that more areas dont have further restrictions put upon them, than it is to have a mass return to work, school, eating out etc all at the same time.
If everything remains ok, then turn the tap a little more.
I would have thought that "we" would want the virus as much under control as possible as we move into the winter months.
icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpgYour job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.:icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpg
Quote: wrencat1873 "Absolutely agree regarding exams, even if it had meant moving them back (a little).
You may be right about the outbreaks but, I'm not privy to the precise information so, wouldn't want to make those generalisations.
As for the R number, your wrong.
It has been increasing (slightly) over the last couple of months and is currently said to be between 0.9 and 1.1.
We are right on the line, hence my comments about how quickly the tap is being turned on.
For me, it's better to give schools those couple of weeks and try to ensure that more areas dont have further restrictions put upon them, than it is to have a mass return to work, school, eating out etc all at the same time.
If everything remains ok, then turn the tap a little more.
I would have thought that "we" would want the virus as much under control as possible as we move into the winter months.'"
We have been at this level of R number for several months - I agree with your sentiment of trying to control the virus - but we cannot continue to trash the economy forever - the consequences would be far worse than anything the virus will do
Quote: Sal Paradise "We have been at this level of R number for several months - I agree with your sentiment of trying to control the virus - but we cannot continue to trash the economy forever - the consequences would be far worse than anything the virus will do'"
No we havent.
Before restrictions were eased, the rate was 0.7 - 0.9 and it's now 0.9 - 1.1.
With a rate of 1 being the tipping point for local lockdowns, some areas are right on the cusp, including Wakefield where I live.
I sure as hell dont want any additional restrictions on movement, therefore, some caution would be wise.
33809_1522680904.png'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_33809.png
Quote: Sal Paradise "We have been at this level of R number for several months - I agree with your sentiment of trying to control the virus - but we cannot continue to trash the economy forever - the consequences would be far worse than anything the virus will do'"
Get you, with your scaredy cat project fear talk. Always with the doom and gloom.
We just need to hold our nerve and stay at home watching Netflix in our pyjamas - once the economy sees we’re not going to give in to its unreasonable demands for productivity, it’ll have back to back down. While poverty and eventual starvation will be bad for us, it’ll be just as bad for the economy.
icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpgYour job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.:icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpg
Quote: wrencat1873 "No we havent.
Before restrictions were eased, the rate was 0.7 - 0.9 and it's now 0.9 - 1.1.
With a rate of 1 being the tipping point for local lockdowns, some areas are right on the cusp, including Wakefield where I live.
I sure as hell dont want any additional restrictions on movement, therefore, some caution would be wise.'"
So if you take the margin of error it could have been closer to .9 than point .7 and it still could be closer to .9 than 1.1 - it is not as if it has been down at .3, .5 - so yes it has been at similar levels for months.
Even the government accept the R is a very blunt tool and the overall number can be influence by high levels in certain areas. So because you have issues in Wakefield everyone should have increased restrictions? Perhaps a greater understanding why it is happening in Wakefield would be far more useful and a policy adapted to deal with it e.g. Glasgow than blanket impact everyone?
You are typical of what is going on in this country - running scared of something that impacts so few people - deaths are virtually nil - complete overreaction
icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpgYour job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.:icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpg
Quote: Mild Rover "Get you, with your scaredy cat project fear talk. Always with the doom and gloom.
We just need to hold our nerve and stay at home watching Netflix in our pyjamas - once the economy sees we’re not going to give in to its unreasonable demands for productivity, it’ll have back to back down. While poverty and eventual starvation will be bad for us, it’ll be just as bad for the economy.'"
Grow up - please - the state of the economy impact every single person in this country - Covid has impacted a very tiny proportion of it - what would you say is the thing to be protected?
33809_1522680904.png'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_33809.png
Quote: Sal Paradise "Grow up - please - the state of the economy impact every single person in this country - Covid has impacted a very tiny proportion of it - what would you say is the thing to be protected?'"
Okay, sorry. I am just very frustrated by us having such a rubbish, clueless, feckless, infantile Prime Minister.
I think the extent of the hazard has to be considered, as well as the number at risk. While tens of thousands of deaths and some quite severe longer-term consequences for some survivors, in a country of tens of millions, would be a tiny proportion in other contexts, this is literally life and death. And to a large extent, the limits on the impact to this point are because we have chosen to take an economic hit. I also think talking about COVID in the past tense isn’t sensible at this point.
On my angry and clumsy Brexit comparison. Nobody likes COVID, whereas 48% of the electorate liked the EU enough to want to remain as part of it. And, in fairness, not that many of the 52% will have imagined we’d pursue the most economically damaging form of Brexit, in the most unprepared and incompetent of ways.
There’s no solution, only choices. I just feel somewhat appalled at hearing Boris ‘f*** business’ Johnson saying we need to get the country back to work, like he gives half a poop about anything other than his own overweening and self-defeating ambition.
icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpgYour job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.:icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpg
Quote: Mild Rover "Okay, sorry. I am just very frustrated by us having such a rubbish, clueless, feckless, infantile Prime Minister.
I think the extent of the hazard has to be considered, as well as the number at risk. While tens of thousands of deaths and some quite severe longer-term consequences for some survivors, in a country of tens of millions, would be a tiny proportion in other contexts, this is literally life and death. And to a large extent, the limits on the impact to this point are because we have chosen to take an economic hit. I also think talking about COVID in the past tense isn’t sensible at this point.
On my angry and clumsy Brexit comparison. Nobody likes COVID, whereas 48% of the electorate liked the EU enough to want to remain as part of it. And, in fairness, not that many of the 52% will have imagined we’d pursue the most economically damaging form of Brexit, in the most unprepared and incompetent of ways.
There’s no solution, only choices. I just feel somewhat appalled at hearing Boris ‘f*** business’ Johnson saying we need to get the country back to work, like he gives half a poop about anything other than his own overweening and self-defeating ambition.'"
I agree with you about some of the government especially Boris - there are good ministers: Shapps, Sunek, Gibb, Gove, Lewis to name a few. The leadership is terrible.
Seasonal flu kills thousands every year - it is no surprise the excess deaths have fallen below the seasonal average which suggests many of those that have died of COVID would have died anyway just 2/3 months later. We don't close the economy down despite the impact of seasonal flu. For the vast majority people who get this virus it isn't a matter of life and death - especially amongst the young. I would agree this virus will be with us a long time - perhaps if we were more proactive in dealing with it rather than running scared we would improve our chances of returning to normality.
Brexit really upsets you - is that your lefty superior attitude and that you know best - who could any sane person vote to leave when in your mind being a big contributor with no influence e.g. cuckold is a preferable position. You can see from the negotiations what the EU want - a veto over our own laws and open season in our waters? Perhaps you need to be more objective about Brexit and why all those idiots (sic) didn't bow down to your superior knowledge and Nostradamus-like insight into the next few years?
Boris needs a return to the status quo - and quick - and he needs to start making good decisions
At the moment coronavirus is still baffling everyone, latest spanner in the works on today’s bbc web site by medical correspondent is the coronavirus test is testing positive for people who had the virus weeks ago and yet are fit and healthy. The majority of the medical experts can’t agree. Example, Sweden seems to have managed reasonable well without a draconian lock down. Read the other day one medical expert claiming the peak of coronavirus had passed as we went into lockdown. Personally only know of one person who has had it, pal of mine 72 years old quite fit Suffered for 5 days, then another 5 days to recover without any problems. Nobody in his family or friends who were in contact with him myself included contacted the virus.
Brexit is the unknown so I would tone down your positivity until the full impact is felt. I note you say Boris needs to start making good decisions, if you think he is capable of this then I must also reject your optimism that he will or has when it comes to Brexit.
We agreed a deal with the EU signed by May and passed in Parliament, it is this Boris is trying to change including doubling the fish quota limits. I sense that with Cummins doing the guiding a no deal Brexit is the preferred option. We do not have long now before we see the frictionless trade through Nth Ireland Boris promised and the smooth operations at Dover with the expert pre planning put in place by Gove.
I can see many months of chaos which they will blame on the EU let’s see who is correct and let’s see who suffers the most us or the much larger EU.
33809_1522680904.png'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_33809.png
Quote: Sal Paradise "
Brexit really upsets you - is that your lefty superior attitude and that you know best - '"
Yes, it is. I’m not proud of that... but at this point I’m not hugely embarrassed either.
I’m much more upset at Boris Johnson and Michael Gove failing to face up to the hard choices Brexit demands, than Brexit itself.
Quote: Sal Paradise " who could any sane person vote to leave when in your mind being a big contributor with no influence e.g. cuckold is a preferable position. You can see from the negotiations what the EU want - a veto over our own laws and open season in our waters? Perhaps you need to be more objective about Brexit and why all those idiots (sic) didn't bow down to your superior knowledge and Nostradamus-like insight into the next few years?
Boris needs a return to the status quo - and quick - and he needs to start making good decisions'"
I could see from well before the negotiations what the EU wanted, they have been very open about it, and that Brexit couldn’t therefore be as advertised.
A lot of people are just tired of the current system at a number of levels. Politics has prioritised floating voters in swing seats, leaving a lot people’s views neglected. I understand and share much of the anger and frustration, their desire for change. I can understand a preference for sovereignty to reside (even) more at the national level and the impacts of immigration on the labour market, both positive and negative. Maybe this was needed as some sort of national breakdown, identity crisis, pressure valve, post-empire, post-deindustrialisation, post-financial crash and austerity slate cleaner. Fingers crossed, because there are other possibilities that scare the poop out of me.
22575.gif"Brian McDermott, with a wry smile, nods when asked if he remembers a specific incident which made him realise he was a prick. 'I do', he murmurs.":22575.gif
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.