I thought he performed well tonight.Hes never been my fav whistler, but I thought he tried to let the game flow where possible, and from my position in the South stand looked to get most decisions right whilst being consistent for both teams................................or is our 1st win clouding my judgment?

Also thought he had a good game! Think I must be running a temperature!

he wasn't to bad, seen worse performances.

missed a few things, but he is human after all. took crusaders back a short 10 in defence though, i thought

Our very good discipline helped though. The only silly penalty we conceded was when Turner tried to work off to get into marker position instead of rolling to the side.

He had a decent game,credit where its due.We are always quick to slate refs.

One thing that 's bugging me from last nights game is a restart from the Crusaders were the kicker was in Hulls half before he kicked the ball . Isn't this a penalty to the defending side ?.

A couple of people round me were asking if he was wearing Black and White underpants.

If I was a Crusaders fan I'd have been pretty annoyed with his performace TBH, we got away with loads.... forward passes (one so blantant most people around me in the East Stand were chuckling and he was stood right next to it), head shots, standing offside... Ganson would have killed us IMO - but it worked well for us - agreed Crusaders were a skinny 10 at times.

That's funny 'cos we thought he took us back about 12metres for quite a bit of the game, not complaining though, we got two points.

Yeah, its funny how perception works and how convenient it can be at times.

would never want to be a whistler TBH, very high pressure sitrep for all concerned...
worth every penny to be honest ....
But Ganson well thats a different story

thaler and alibert both reffing well - its a strange season

indeed