Looks like there will be s fair few Salford players available, Id take Watkins back!

Watkins makes a lot of sense. Not sure I’d be too interested in anyone one else. Maybe sneyd if nothing else it’ll let Sinfield go on a proper loan.

No chance Frawley goes - BA likes/rates him and made him captain for a game last season. If we go for anyone it will be Watkins IMO.

[quote="FGB":2tlnpnut]No chance Frawley goes - BA likes/rates him and made him captain for a game last season. If we go for anyone it will be Watkins IMO.[/quote:2tlnpnut] I agree. We currently bat deep at half back (Croft, Frawley, Connor, Sinfield) but we're light in the 2nd row, which is a far more attritional position. Watkins makes more sense, and if anybody is well positioned to strike a deal it would be Blease.

[quote="ArthurClues":o81znyd0]who despite being in special measures for the 2nd time in two years, were still planning a trip to Portugal this week. How many times does this have to happen before they learn to live within their means? [/quote:o81znyd0] This was something Matt Shaw came up with in a largely nonsensical article. The pre-season training trip will have been booked and paid for a long time ago.

[quote="MjM":to3exs4f]This was something Matt Shaw came up with in a largely nonsensical article. The pre-season training trip will have been booked and paid for a long time ago.[/quote:to3exs4f] I'm sure it was but either way it's surely an unnecessary large expense for a club with particularly shaky finances, having recently stayed afloat by selling off 3 of it'main assets and going cap in hand to their supporters.. seems irresponsible.