At the play the ball at the end with the kick off involving Zak, did anyone else see that he got bit by a Giants player? Leeming maybe?

the point of the obstruction rule is that players can be out of position to effect a tackle. if you honestly believe that huby played no part in that phase of play then i thnk you need to take of your hudds glasses and think about what your interpretation would of been had it been at other end of the field.

the ref is lucky it didnt with the way Brough was acting.....

He sometimes gives that impression but I think the truth lies closer to him not really hurting anyone when he does take the ball in. He can take some putting down - sometimes - but somehow never seems to take a right lot out of the defence. Bit like Kyle Amor.

That was never an obstruction in s month of Sundays. If Cuthbertson's antics had have succeeded in disallowing a try it would have been poor form. Cuthbertson was pishing about and should have attempted a tackle. Leeds fans who think Cuthbertson's antics should have worked, imagine Brough, Briers or some other "Villain" acting up that way. You'be be having a fit.

There were two or three times when Mulhern - a kid in prop terms - took him down one on one.

He seems to have lost a yard of pace which means he's taking a lot less momentum into collision.