On the one hand he's saying a bad call is immaterial in the context of a game, these things even themselves out and are irrelevant. When Rovers win by 5.

On the other he's saying one bad call, which was actually a good call, is the entire reason for a result. When Rovers lose by 8.

No it wasn't.

Get over it.

I didnt quite see it that way !!!!!

It was knocked on, if that had been Leeds and it had been given, I'd have been pi$$ ed off.

If it had been Leeds its WOULD have been given dont worry about that

That's a whole different subject, and I agree.

Didn't Senior and Donald have tries disallowed?

Put brain in gear before posting, it makes you look less of an idiot.

Seniors And Donalds were more clear cut

Put brain in gear before posting it makes you look less of an idiot

No they weren't, all three were clear to the video ref.

Websters was the only one that could have been given B.O.T.D

No it couldn't or else it would have been given as such. I must say when I was there I was surprised it had been disallowed bu ton returning home and watching it Sky+ it was clear. This was illustrated be the fact that there was only one of the commentary team who said that it should have been a try and his opinions are well known to be laughable.

Now get over it or are you going to cry yourself to sleep tonight?

Im already over it sunshine

your sky+ must be better than mine cos it was not clear to me(although it will have been to you)

We have HD in west hull. Crystal clear knock on !

Clearly...

I must admit it was a bit harsh, it should have been allowed (B.o.t.d)

Oh well it must have been a knock on then

Why when there was no doubt?

Or are you another who laps up everything Stevo says...

If there was no doubt why is it still being discussed?

But you're over it right...

Just as a matter of interest, if you don't think that Webster touched the ball, what do [iyou[/i think caused it to change direction and rotation in mid-air?

Sore losers whining is my guess.

Because some people can't accept the truth.

Was there a gyroscope in the ball?

I never said he didnt touch it
when i first saw it i thought he did but then i wasnt so sure on other replays

Was it...

a) The ball didnt move direction.
b) The wind.
c) A ghost.
d) None of the above and ok he must have touched it.