It's a slight negative for me this season.

My targets at the beginning of the year were making the play off's and winning a game and a decent CC run.

I think we've progressed but there's still a lot of work to do.

I wouldn't say I got completely "meh" as Mr. Anakin did, but I definitely had a low spell around May/June time.

Toulouse was great fun and the advancement of players like Salter, Ollett, Hepi, Green, Cox and Eden has been good.

We're a mid table club that can produce the odd shock, that's where we're at.

While certainly not our finest year, and much as the likes of Dobson and Paea have been integral to much of the good things we've done, there have been good things. It's been a curate's egg, rather than dismal - though certainly there have been dismal moments and performances in there too. Pretty much what I anticipated, if not in any detail.

As Sandra says, we're a mid-table team and without running losses on the scale of of St. Helens we're stuck for now as a mid-ranking club. Better than being in Wakefield's predicament, or London's. that would be dismal. Count your blessings, I guess.

It seems you hull fans seem to have forgotten,saints thrashed you on your own ground 2 weeks ago and you most of you went home before the usual 60 mins,its lucky i'm here to remind you !

Thanks, I forgot all about that!

And in the grand scheme of things, it meant absolutely nothing. Your loss to Saints has cost your club a LOT of money and meant you finished the season with a whimper.

We'll probably lose on Thursday, but I fully expected to lose last week and was surprised with the response. Your response to a beating by London, was a severe beating by Saints.

Must try harder.

How has it cost us a lot of money,I thought the play off money went into a pool ??

Do you think the clubs who whimper out in the first game get as much ££££ as those that progress further? Do you not know that SL prize money is based on finishing position after the play offs?