Had to happen eventually. monkeys, typewriters and Shakespeare spring to mind

I think he's the exact opposite of super pessimist Seb. Zod is a the ultimate delusional optimist and despite being knocked back at every turn, he'll reappear next season with the same outlandish bilge.

I meant in terms of credibility

Credibility can be affected if people discredit something someone posts even if it is done without real justification.

It's like this Fox vs Briscoe thing from 2009 which constantly gets regurgitated year on year to discredit the original post because in current terms, Briscoe has gone on to prove himself to be a better player than Fox.

But at that specific point in time, Briscoe was targeted against the Aussies to such an extent that a proven winning coach in Tony Smith substituted him at half-time and didn;t play again for the rest of the tournament.

Tony Smith saw fit to choose Fox in the final, because he saw him as the better option at that moment in time. Ask him now and he'd no doubt chose Briscoe over Fox but time is linear.

You need no help in discrediting yourself

That's spot on. Neither have any!!

Delusional. Odd how no other Rovers fans want to spring to Zods defence. They're distancing themselves because he digs himself into holes.

You have had a dismal season and have lost your 2 best players. You've also paid £30,000 for a player you sacked for gross misconduct.

Not your finest year.

It's a slight negative for me this season.

My targets at the beginning of the year were making the play off's and winning a game and a decent CC run.

I think we've progressed but there's still a lot of work to do.

I wouldn't say I got completely "meh" as Mr. Anakin did, but I definitely had a low spell around May/June time.

Toulouse was great fun and the advancement of players like Salter, Ollett, Hepi, Green, Cox and Eden has been good.

We're a mid table club that can produce the odd shock, that's where we're at.

While certainly not our finest year, and much as the likes of Dobson and Paea have been integral to much of the good things we've done, there have been good things. It's been a curate's egg, rather than dismal - though certainly there have been dismal moments and performances in there too. Pretty much what I anticipated, if not in any detail.

As Sandra says, we're a mid-table team and without running losses on the scale of of St. Helens we're stuck for now as a mid-ranking club. Better than being in Wakefield's predicament, or London's. that would be dismal. Count your blessings, I guess.

It seems you hull fans seem to have forgotten,saints thrashed you on your own ground 2 weeks ago and you most of you went home before the usual 60 mins,its lucky i'm here to remind you !

Thanks, I forgot all about that!

And in the grand scheme of things, it meant absolutely nothing. Your loss to Saints has cost your club a LOT of money and meant you finished the season with a whimper.

We'll probably lose on Thursday, but I fully expected to lose last week and was surprised with the response. Your response to a beating by London, was a severe beating by Saints.

Must try harder.

How has it cost us a lot of money,I thought the play off money went into a pool ??

Do you think the clubs who whimper out in the first game get as much ££££ as those that progress further? Do you not know that SL prize money is based on finishing position after the play offs?