FORUMS > Doncaster RLFC > Kyle Kesik to start |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 549 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2015 | Sep 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Mods can you please make this a sticky, and hope that the message gets back across to Tony Miller.
Please start with Kyle Keswick, and don't take him iff when he is playing well.
If you agree can you post a reply.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 18610 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
22214_1285226877.jpg War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
Thank God I'm an atheist.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_22214.jpg |
|
| Kyle Kesik to start and not go off at all.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 8058 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Got to agree with the starting part .
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 17996 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
2911.jpg :2911.jpg |
Moderator
|
| I also agree
I don't want this to sound like we are criticising jack Ely as I think he does a good job, but think he would be better used elsewhere in the pack
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 18610 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
22214_1285226877.jpg War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
Thank God I'm an atheist.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_22214.jpg |
|
| To me three out of the four subs should be forwards ad not just all second rowers. It's the big guys that need a rest, not little ones like Kesik. Only Kyle Sampson is a big lad out of our four from yesterday. To be fair we made room for Grant Edwards, he took one subs place, but it will take him a fair while to get back to full lung-bursting match fitness, at that time he should start and not come off.
We are getting to the stage where a few lads will have to be left out now, disappointing as it will be, especially when Morrison and Green play. Kesik however is first on the team sheet for me, every available chance.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 24 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2011 | May 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| I totally agree and after listening to people talk when kyle was brought off when the dons were only 18-10 down i think alot of people agree. I cant understand why he is took off at such crucial moments in the game when he is playing so well. He gives 100% every week and always lifts the team spirit. Tony needs to start sorting it or i have a feeling we will lose him to another club and that really would be a shame.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 100896 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
Fish/PDT_Fish_35.gif :Fish/PDT_Fish_35.gif |
Moderator
|
| Posted the following on the match thread yesterday ...
... and now my big bug-bear from today (and I'll be careful and ask it as a question) ... is Kyle Kesik not up to playing longer than he does? He gave us great go forward and imagination and I for one cannot understand why he was withdrawn at 18-10 when we seemed to be starting to cause them one or two problems?
So I too concur.
In agreement with Jemmo, I would add that it isn't a criticism of Jack Ely.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 940 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2023 | Jan 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| This was always going to happen when you sign 83 hookers
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 297 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2012 | Aug 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
22264.gif :22264.gif |
|
| Also agree. Just look at the stats they will speak volumes. Once again i would like to stress i don't think anyone is having a go at Jack Ely as he is a good player and always gives 100%. I like Jemmo think Jack should be used as a replacement for one of the forwards as he makes good yards.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 218 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
45110.jpg Not thyself but the cause:45110.jpg |
|
| Have to agree that it continues to mystify me how someone can 'big up' Kesik then does nt start with him,then takes him off whilst we re still in the game. However Ely is also a cracking player. May be someone needs to use a little imagination on how we use our good players.
At least whilst we re still being mystified it saves on winning money.
|
|
|
|
|
|