I have slept on the matter in a effort to avoid knee jerk conclusions.
after consideration i draw the following conclusions from last night:
Pros/cause for optimism;
*The attendance - very encouraging, especially for a freezing cold night against wakefield.
*The performances of Danny craven, Marsh, Dean and Hep Cahill. Paddy ah van also derserves a mention for his tireless work running from acting half coming of our own line, made a lot of hard yards that way (as did Dean and Marsh). Cahill (A FORWARD) also burned the wakey threequarters over 60 meters for his try
*Overall we didnt look overhwhelmed (at least for around 65 minutes) which is cause for hope given that we had 4-5 'first choicers' unavailable, there was also a lot of enthusiasm on show until we visibly ran out of petrol towards the end.
Cons/potential causes of future concern;
two stand out for me, penalties/lack of discipline and generally looking disorganised.
Several times hanbury was caught in posession whilst visibly screaming for runners that never came, and clarke is never a half back, he continued to play from half back like a hooker, which didnt really come off. - however, this is fixed by the inclusion of watts with clarke reverting back to hooker. this would also fix many of the organisational issues, we need watts and hanbury doing the organising, not hanbury trying to do three jobs at once.
In the first half our short side defence was weak, we managed to remedy this before any real damage was done, but at the expense of open side defence (especially out wide) in the second half, this was highlighted painfully by wakey in the final twenty minutes, in short i think we looked weak defensively in the centres, wingers were often left alone and all to often our sliding defence didnt happen in the second half, and it was not for want of trying on the part of Dean, Marsh of Craven (all of whom i could see getting rather annoyed with the defensive shortcomings) all to often ah van and isa seemed to have a rush of blood and go flying out of the line or get drawn in without commiting to anything. Perhaps the inclusion of more experienced heads like briscoe and phelps will iron out these issues in the three quarters.
Now, none of these things are terrifying - i feel they can and will be remedied by our full first choice line up and work in training, after all i can see them, im sure the coaching staff can and it can all be sorted as the team grows together.
discipline is in some respects worrying and in others not so. some of it can just be put down to being off the pace at times, but that will come with match fitness. whats worrying is the stuff that has no real reasoning, as in lots of high tackles. (granted thaler got a bit high tackle happy in the second half, but still) I worry that moore in particular will kill us with that stuff, especially at this level.
that side of things is the only thing ive taken from last night that really worries me.
I think we will have a much better idea in a few weeks when the coaching staff have had time to identify and iron these issues and we have our strongest team out.
im ready for the hammerings but im optimistic. its not a terrible starting point and im sure improvements will come.