After watching this incident in the Toronto game on television, and the condemnation from the sky commentators, basically judge, jury, and executioners agreeing the despicable incident had indeed occurred, and the subsequent investigation which is apparently going to follow to punish the biter.

In an earlier game between Warrington & Hull
Should the RFL also take action against players who apparently falsely accuse, during, and after the match, of biting, and certain players are allowed to further incite the situation while holding an exclusive interview directly after match, no opportunity to defend himself was extended to the accused, or should we just brush this instance under the carpet. It sets a dangerous precedent.

Didn’t see the game Rider, can you clarify, please.

Quote: Armavinit "Didn’t see the game Rider, can you clarify, please.'" www.skysports.com/share/11499544 Hi Toronto forward Jack Bussey accused, of biting a Toulouse player, game was on Sky and they pretty much sentenced him, fair enough if he’s guilty, but should they take sides, as Hakim our player was accused, and no action taken, regardless of Sky seemingly supporting Hill, should Hill now be questioned.

Quote: Armavinit "Didn’t see the game Rider, can you clarify, please.'" www.skysports.com/share/11499544 Hi Toronto forward Jack Bussey accused, of biting a Toulouse player, game was on Sky and they pretty much sentenced him, fair enough if he’s guilty, but should they take sides, as Hakim our player was accused, and no action taken, regardless of Sky seemingly supporting Hill, should Hill now be questioned.

<Removed>

I suggest that unless you have undoubted proof of your allegation, you keep it to yourself and away from these boards.

Thank you

Karen

No issue for me with the Toronto game in regards to the commentators condemnation of the incident as there was clearly a deliberate movement made by Bussey towards the players ear.

As for the Hill incident I think you're being far too over sensitive and clutching at straws now. Let it go, there's no precedent being set at all.
Hill just bullies smaller younger players.

Wow, I can't believe he bit someone whilst at Donny. You'd have thought he'd learn after the spitting incident, which I'm sure you haven't confused with biting!

Its a rather different incident to the Miloudi one though. I agree that the commentators shouldn't be jumping to conclusions but there was nothing aggressive from the Toulouse player to initiate the incident. Let the panel sort this one out, if there are bite marks on the ear then I think its a pretty open & shut case; if not then look at penalising a false claim.

Quite unlike Hill putting his arm in Miloudi's face and then making a false biting claim - not backed up by any evidence. Unfortunately Hill is a protected species and he got away with a piece of true grubbiness, a fringe player might not have been so lucky.

The point is, Hill was allowed afterwards to further his allegation against our player live in front of the cameras, not over sensitive just feel we were unjustly treated, your right he is a bully, but that’s not the point. My opinion is Hill lied and then lied again.

Ten match ban for Bussey.

… 8 matches for biting (he pleaded guilty) and 2 for a high tackle.