He said he has no plans to retire and is OOC at the end of the year. He is an excellent player when he plays at hooker.

However he will be on big wages and we have Houghton signed long term and Cunningham coming through, who hopefully after a year playing SL will be ready next year.

So do we offer Heremia a new deal, personally I would give him a one year contract (maybe on lower terms) and look to slowly integrate Cunningham into the side.

Cunningham stats from his first two games at London looked pretty good considering they have been well beaten in both games.

I'm totally guessing but i'd of thought Heremia would'nt be on a, relatively, big wage. I would offer 2 years on same terms. I massively rate this guy. What a heart as welll as ability!

He played in a NRL grand final the season before he joined FC so I can't see him being on peanuts. I think he is currently under utilised and if the plan is for him to continue to play 30 mins a game I see it as a big chunk of the cap for minutes played. Undecided.

Livens up the game, and spells hard-working Houghton.


Also lovely to look at (trivial point, but I don't care)

Get him signed up. Been a cracking player for us and I hope he stays. I know it's only been two games but I think he's been better than Houghton so far this term.

Its a no brainer for me. The best hooker at the club, 1 year deal with an option for a 2nd year.

Can't believe this is even being questioned. Resigned to the thought he was returning down-under at the end of this year, the sheer force of our collective sigh of relief that he is now willing to stay should be enough to re-flatten the KC pitch after a polo match.

Retain him. And why on earth should he take reduced terms?

(And Wharfey, I agree. A delectable bonus.)

Only ever seen him in tv games and against us but he seems to be your far better option at 9, adds pace and go forward to your attacck and if you let him go he'll be snapped up very quickly by someone else.

This. ... Get him signed up now

2 yr deal for me and would look for another hooker as Cunningham doesn't do it for me and I wouldn't be upset if Houghton went.

Houghtons defence is 2nd to none at the club but Heremia brings something completely different in attack and we look a lot more dangerous going forward with him on.

I we look after him and he looks after himself we can get far more than just 1 more year out of him. For me so far he is the best player on our books presently. Changes the game as soon as he comes on. Direct fast and intelligent. Why on earth we would a) be debating keeping him b) stating he can stay but on reduced terms is beyond me.

Pretty hard to judge Cunningham after only one SL game for the club.

I think he has all the raw talent and stood out massively in most games I saw at under 19's, needs to SL games and is getting that at london and looks like he is impressing.

Silly to write him off so early.

Agreed - and it would be up to Cunningham to win a spot in the first team simply by being good enough. Exactly how it should be.

Agree with the general consensus.
2 year extended deal should be getting shoved under his nose as I type.