Carry on....

Wouldn't it better 'if possible' to keep Moa, as Cusack, King and Radford will not be here the season after.

I'd like him to stay, that said it depends on which centre we are trying to sign. If it's Tate then I might be tempted to stick with Moa as I am not convinced that Tate's body is up to it even though he oozes class as a player.

Exactly. But it seems our short-sighted approach to recruitment and retention fixated on a reduced-rate Cusack early on in proceedings.

Just what I'm thinking. There's no disputing Tate's pedigree, but if he's just going to be another Adam Dykes then sticking with Moa is the better option.

From the previous thread

Yes and it's split pro-rata across any qualifying players, so the £50,000 cannot just be deducted from Horne's figure.

Yes, that's a fair point.

Yeaman comes under the 11th season rule from 2011, btw.

Doesn't matter how it is accounted for, it's still 50K, and it isn't as if we don't have to "earn" it, remember, £50k in a players pocket costs more than £70k in turnover.

I know i'm going to get shouted down here but i really dont get the lovefest pretty much everyone on here seems to be having regarding Moa.

I think its down to the fact that he plays with 100% enthusiasm mate. Every minute he is out there he he runs and hits with everything he has and to be fair to him he has done well in the last month or so and played more minutes. I still think it's very unlikely he will stay for next season as we already have a good balance of props and we could do with some class in the other centre spot.

It's a symptom of a poor season, Moa is average, nothing more.

Totally agree, just an average player in a sh*te team.

Out of Cusack, Cordoba & Moa I'd rather keep Cordoba to be fair.

i know, 2 fights and not a single sin binning, lol