If we sign brent tate over sam moa then I will be disgusted. We have needed a prop like sam for as long as I can remember, he's a fans favourite, he gives 100% every time he takes to the field, and he genuinely loves playing for Hull.FC. Tate on the other hand brings a whole new meaning to the term 'injury prone' and would, (I imagine) command a hell of a lot of money. In doing so, we would also be shi tting on two of the best, young attacking prospects in the country, in tom briscoe and craig hall. Obviously this is only a rumour, but if it were to happen then I would be very pi$$ed off.

So was Jamie Thackray.

As for needing a prop like him we have O'Meley and Hame to do that job, people say about Tate not playing every game but answer me this if our props stay fit just how many games will Moa actually play?

Hame should be used in the second row.

I'd play Moa every game with Hame in the second row.

Tate would be a colossal waste of cash.

Where has the Quota spot come from.

weve always had a spare one old bean

I disagree. He plays mainly at prop (I think), and in the little that we've seen of him he looked much, much better at Prop that SR.

Amen

Agreed looked like he could cause some damage wider out.

Personally,

IF we signed Tate, it would be a colossal mistake.

World class player - but no use to us, if he's sat in the stand.

Hope the club learnt a valuable lesson, from the signing of Dykes.

Manu succesfully applied to come off it.

Most reports state that Lauaki is a second row. He's played there for the Warriors, the Kiwis and Tonga! That's what we signed him for. That's how we should use him. Together with Manu they'd be devastating out wide.

any where in the back row as our new utility player then next year

No we didn't we signed him to play prop, read the reports.

We signed him to play prop before we knew how Moa would work out. If we keep Moa we could use Hame as a second rower, where he's played most of his RL and where he looked dangerous when running out wide.