In 2015, plenty of youngsters got a chance/debut due to injuries, and Logan went into the 2016 season as a first choice centre. Abdull has had opportunities too to cement a place.

2016 was a completely different story because we had much stronger squad depth, a very strong first 13 and a relatively injury free year. Could the squad have been rotated more? Yes, probably a little, but it still wouldn't have given much more game time to youngsters.

Wigan are the benchmark of course, but it wasn't them promoting youth which saw a raft of youngsters getting game time last year, it was a lengthy injury list. They still have plenty of players in their squad signed from elsewhere too.


It's the nature of the beast that some youngsters will either not make the grade, or will have someone better in front of them. We weren't going to drop Sneyd to give HTW a run in the side. We weren't going to drop Houghton and give Cunningham a run. Dean, Cunningham & HTW have gone elsewhere for game time, fair play to them.

We can't just throw in 2/3 youngsters into a game and potentially sacrifice the two points. There weren't any easy games last year, each win we had to fight for. I don't blame Radford for playing his strongest 17 at all. What exactly are you proposing Radford does? Genuine question, would you for instance drop Washy and play Turgut in for a month? Drop Fonua and play Logan for a few weeks?

Exactly.

No coach would drop a fit senior player and put in a youngster for a number of weeks. Youngsters are played out of necessity to cover injuries. The hope is that the system has prepared them enough to do so to an adequate standard, and the onus is also on that PLAYER to take the chance presented to him. Of course, some won't get the chance due to having someone better infront of them, but that's just how it is and has always been.

Look at Leeds as another example in recent seasons. Lilley played last year as McGuire was out for large parts. Handley to cover Hall. Golding to cover Hardaker once he was suspended. Sutcliffe maybe, but I can't see him being first choice next year. Some forwards have had game time, but still none have really cemented a spot recently.

Of course other big teams sign other teams kids, but if Hull FC is to be able to regularly compete at the top level then we need a regular influx of youth coming through to be more than bit part squad members that get the odd game here or there.
Despite all the investment and shouting about how fantastic our youth system is the reality is we've not had many coming through at all the last few years when the fruition should have being kicking in.
5 years on and we have 3 Hull youth players from that period in the 1st 17 - Shaul, Bowden, Hadleys not what i would call a good return.
I'm not trying to be negative, I'm just worried that after seeing quite a few fall by the waysiude that our youth system is doing what we had hoped it would given the cash and effort thrown at it.

One possible solution to allow clubs to have the option of blooding more youngsters in a first team game would be to increase the number of players on the interchange bench, perhaps to 6. You could keep the amount of interchanges the same, but by having extra places available clubs would have the opportunity to involve a youngster on the bench, and if the game scenario allowed for it, said youngster/s would be able to enter the game and gain experience. As it is, only injuries or the youngster being too good to refuse game time are the likely scenario where most clubs would give a youngster a break.

He was ok, did nothing special just solid, young Oakes looked better.

Despite his age and not having played for two years he would have improved your team on Sunday. That must say something about your much vaunted fringe players. Even Radford expressed his disappointment at their performance.

most of us and radford probably know the youngsters are far from ready for superleague!

put them in with first team players they can hold their own, like against warrington last easter monday and wigan in the super 8s in 2015!

i noticed rovers didnt attack the kelly, carlos and michaels side of the pitch much in the first half, they targetted our weaker centre and winger! certainly setting high targets and testing themselves there!

I'm comfortable with the result, in some respects there's a lot more pressure on the youngsters as it's one of the few early season opportunities to show how they can perform but when you have much superior opposition against you it isn't easy to play your natural game, less so when you have players on and off the field and also when there's a fair few of them together a reasonable standard below the opposition
You put a couple of these lads in with the backbone of the 1st XVII and they are much more likely to perform to a higher std, there'd be much more on field direction, the backbone of the team will have played with each other a lot so holes/errors that a relatively inexperienced team will make won't be made as often if at all and so individual players/youngsters in a senior side (hopefully) won't be as exposed which gives them a better chance of doing what they should be and are capable of.
A lot of it is down to the mental side of things and lack of senior playing experience, multiplied up by half your team and it shows up more overall.
Certainly hope Radford can feel comfortable with giving some of these lads a run and not too late in the season because it'll be extremely good fortune if we get as few injuries as last and because of other factors and his inexperience as a coach felt he couldn't rest players more often.

ATEOTD we'll see what happens first couple of Sl games and where we are at. Reproduce the Salford/Catalans performances of last year and any stress over how these early friendlies have gone will disappear in an instant.

Some scathing commentary on the Bradford situation being allowed to happen and the financial state of the Championship by Radford. Some decent points made. www.hulldailymail.co.uk/hull-fc- ... story.html

Some scathing commentary on the Bradford situation being allowed to happen and the financial state of the Championship by Radford. Some decent points made. www.hulldailymail.co.uk/hull-fc- ... story.html

They're back. Good news, maybe we'll dual reg with them. www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/38616454

They're back. Good news, maybe we'll dual reg with them. www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/38616454

I'd hope that we can do a deal with Bradford and help them out short term (and us) my loaning them 2/3 players, maybe the likes of Logan, Fash and Turgut.

Dave Woods just tweeted been told to expect "jaw-droppingly good" head coach appointment at Bradford in the next couple of days. Assuming it's not the rumoured Henry Paul then.