They may have a young kid coming through but in the latter part of last season anyone could see they missed Long when he was out injured.
It was even commented on by numerous people including Sky,Saints board and even members of the Saints squad.

I do not buy into any member of Saints was happy to see him go or 100% sure they had made the right call.

I thought they also missed him at times during the season but remember he has been such a vital cog to them for so long, he is a massive part of the team.

I disagree, I also think Burrow & Brough are better..Dobson will get shown for the just above average player he is next season, is defence is very very suspect.

Like I pointed out earlier, why did he not get 'shown up for the average player he is' in his spells at Catalan and Wigan, please explain it to me because I dont understand?

He was just above average at both those clubs, you will not understand because your sight is blurred with those red & white tinted specs.

He is not a very consistent, his defence is very suspect and once targeted (play-offs an example) he goes missing.

his pack were better there for a start

He may not have been outstanding in the NRL comp but here in SL, there is no doubting he has performed at very high standard, however you want to cover it up!

Rupert Pupkin once again shows what a poor troll he is.

Once again knows like the majority, that Dobson is a better player than Long, not in the past but as it stands now.

is that a fact

so your saying that 2008 and 2009 dobson was better then long

Im saying that last season, Dobson was better than Long and most other scrum halves playing in the competition.

So what about my question to you, how do you think others would see it?

so long who has a great pack to work with

will not do as good as dobson who will be working with a poor pack


get back on your JD n coke silly lad