You see a coke user as ok then too?

Really are some that thick?

I suppose you thought Reardon was ok for smacking his lass then

Which part of his post said it was legal, or even remotely inferred that he condoned drug use?

I think he was just questioning the use of junkie and smack, as they typically refer to Heroin rather than Cocaine.

I think we were taking issue with you calling Hock a heroin addict

WTF has Reardon got to do with anything?

The "out cry" when we signed him the day we launched an anti domestic violence campaign

AP went to town about James Rule, Martin Gleeson and the other one. Cant see him backing Zammo being signed up

You call others 'thick', then accuse someone of condoning drug use who has done no such thing, before making the massive leap of logic that this means he also condones domestic violence.

Heroin = smack

Cocaine = Charlie etc etc

Suggesting Hock is a smack rat isn't correct, based on the ban he got. He may also not be happy to be branded as that...

..and people wonder why everyone is leaving this message board

The point is about Hock

People are arguing the toss about his on the field record and his card collection. Id be more concerned about his recreational habits.

And in case some forget, there no harm in reminding them


And seen as this board is about opinions. I dont like him, and i dont think he would be a good signing

Now you are suggesting he can read



maybe i should have just used druggie eh?

It is about opinions, but when you call other people thick whilst making a fairly stupid statement yourself, it might lead others to the opinion that you're a little silly.

Which still has absolutely nothing to do with people (quite correctly) questioning your use of inaccurate terms.

Happens all the time in life i'm afraid.

And his inference that if you don't have a problem with recreational cocaine use, you're automatically ok with a man beating up a woman.

I would have thought Ryan McGoldrick would be up there too .

And when it does, it's only natural that people will point it out.

[urlhttp://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/junkie?q=junkie[/url

So hang on a minute. This hissy fit you're in the middle of is actually aimed at people who don't want us to sign Hock, same as you don't, but your big bone of contention is that they don't want him for the wrong reason?

If you bother to read people's posts, not one goes anywhere near considering Hock's off the pitch behaviour as acceptable, so nobody's even disagreed with you. You rant on if it makes you happy, though.

And forever will if people continue to behave in the ignorant manner you are displaying, refusing to listen and learn and instead picking fights where there are none.

Guess what

We are at Wembley, who really cares!

Perfectly obvious though, innit? Think the main ingredient in Stella is Cocaine.

I think Hock is one of the best forwards in the game , I think we'd be a better team with him in it .

Wonder if our offer for James Graham is still on the table

I'd happily pi$$ in a cup for him if he was ripping SL up for us.

don't you ing dare accuse me of condoning domestic violence, don't you ing dare.