I've said all season that one baffles me. Out of the 2 of them, it's Agar who has been here throughout our decline, it's Agar who claims to be the attacking coach, and it's Agar who should be responsible for team selections and the interchange policy. Attempting to pin the blame on Sharp allegedly having too much say just seems like an attempt to excuse Agar with no real basis to support it IMO.

I'm not particularly convinced either are up to it, but I certainly wouldn't say Sharp is more culpable than Agar.

Where has the link with us and Noble come from ?

I am leaning more towards this...

This is the rumours thread

who needs links

I rate Noble highly and think he has done a god job with Wigan and would like him at Hull. However, he did have clashes with both Long and Calderwood and I wonder if that would be a problem for either player. I don't think it would be, especially for Long as he was willing to talk to Wigan about joining them but who knows.

Have you seen us with the ball?!?

We have the 3rd worst attack in SL, not within 100 points of anyone ahead of us. We had the absolute worst last season.

In contrast, we have the best defence outside of the top 6, and along with Hudds (where Sharp was coaching) the best outside the top 5.

Make no mistake, the bulk of our problems lie fairly and squarely with our attack, and it's by a big margin. We have a mediocre defence, but a phenomenally poor attack.

Noble and Sharp the 'dream ticket'?!?!

Can't believe people want Sharp to come in tbh. Look at what Huddersfield where with him, didn't even get into the play offs last year - now with only a few signings and a new coach they're in CC final and challenging the big 2 for the first time since us... He has a past record for holding teams below there potential and is NOT the type of coach we want.

The whole 'two equal manager' stuff doesn't work and I can think of few situations where it has, what message do you think it sends to your coach when you say: "Look we think you'll need a little help next season so we're bringing in a DOR to work above you, to overlook you." He's basically just waiting for Agar to fail so he can swoop in and make us average for another 2 years.

If we're going to get rid of Agar we need to get rid of Sharp too.

Do they? I've not seen anyone say so. In fact I think most people agree with your last comment.

(BTW though, Hudds did actually make the CC Final with Sharp in charge as well)

hes done a good job not sure about god

I'd be happy with the appointment of Noble and a few 0's should have fallen off the price tag of Fielden

.

and his wage bill