well i would love to go back to a rebuilt boulevard, if that was the outcome

enjoy living in the past

not living in the past, if it was rebuilt that is surely for the future

moving back to a ground that would be 13,000 max and risk our economic viability, that is the past.

Not enough room there to make a big enough stadium.

add in parking, transport links and we've really done this to death between us all!!! (again!!!!!)

where's Brough

well i havn't been on this forum thing long, so if i drag up old arguments you will have to forgive me, i just miss the place

Huddersfield

to be honest they aren't arguments, just conversations, most people eventually realise and understand that the limitations of the site would mean we would struggle commerically, and that kind of kills the conversation.

I miss Charlie's Angels, but I wouldn't thank you for a night in a hotel room with them now!

i can see what you are saying tbf, but i will always miss the place and i would thank you for a night in a hotel room with the charlies angels (2006 remake that is)

ah, you see, you're being selective on your timelines, I doubt I'd last a night!

Give Hull City the KC and build a new stadium, Share it with KR

Hull FC and Hull KR in one stadium

haha doubt i would standee, but i would pass out a very happy man

I said this in pub on Monday. So long as we play on the Friday night still and p!sh all over the seats ready for the reds

at the miniute we cant share a joke with the es let alone a stadium, so long as it was in west hull eh

The thing with this whole argument is stupid. The PL have no right to enforce anything like this on a community stadium. They could possibly force a PL team who own the stadium, Wigan, to maybe get rid of a team but not a team in a stadium such as the KC. This is just ridiculous IMO if they are serious in their thoughts and they should know that the pitch at Wigan was a disgrace not the KC’s and this was down to the weather and not the rugby.

But the main issue here is that the PL won’t be an issue as City are going to be in administration and the Championship next year.

build it on the river

The arrogance of the Premier League knows no bounds but not even they can strike down a legally binding lease. The only way FC would agree to leave the KC would be if they received enough money to build a new stadium. Hull City has no money and no assets against which to borrow money.

The Premier League have more chance of kicking Hull City out of the Premier League than they have of kicking FC out of the KC.

And we can send Wigan to your place, problem solved!

problem is, it's not big enough for Wigan, it's just about big enough for Willy Wonka's team, until he loses interest.

They won't have any jurisdiction to do anything against FC all they could do was impose a fine on City but even then I'm sure they'd not have a leg to stand on.

What they may be able to do is stop any clubs doing this from the off BUT it would be difficult as you say to break a lease should a clause not have been written in the contract to say if the team go into the Premier league then the other club would have to move out.

I hope the RL actually don’t just sit back and take this and come out and back up the clubs that are in this position.

Won't affect us as Hull City don't own the stadium and The Premier League are not the law plus Hull City will be in the championship in four weeks anyways and will not come back up for long time.

Not immediately relevant, but there is a story about extending the KC's capacity to 30k, with a hotel and business park in the HDM:

[urlhttp://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/news/163-20m-hotel-business-centre-unlock-KC-Stadium-expansion/article-1978475-detail/article.html[/url

The SMC, City, Bartlett, Pearson, The council or Hull RLFC do NOT have £20mill

It'd be a hotelier or commercial property developer funding it if it did happen, I assume.