the club absolutely love 'fans' like you, doesn't matter what the price is you'll pay, doesn't matter how poor it is you'll go...they can just put their feet up and sit counting the cash

you have a choice, either go or dont.

whats all that about then

Yes, these are glory days compared to dark days in the past.

thats the reason i will renew, although when i wake up and agar is still in charge the day after a game i could easily be talked out of not renewing.

Yes I will...glutton for punishment that I am after this year.....miss half of the games at home and most of them away with them altering the match day, but still I'll be getting a pass. Just think how Hugnel would love to have fans as faithful as the black n whites!!!!......as said in earlier post, been through worse times pre the season just gone, and hoping for a really good one in 2010.......grannyfan Cindy

No, Ill just go to away games I think.

No.

Whether Agar is in charge or not.

Better to choose your games then if we end up with another season like this one, I can just stop wasting my time going to games.

mmmmmmm

I'm sure at some point the Rule lovers and the man himself will come out with all the 12,000 fans, 8,000 pass holders rubbish.

The fact is, our gate income is similar to Rovers, afterall we only see 50% of ticket sales above 7,500.

So realistically, crowds of 12,500 are producing an income of a 10,000 gate

BIG NO THATS 4 IN MY HOUSE

I might, but not if they increase the price.

I might also move seats so I no longer have to put up with Hull Kingston Convicts. He's a pain in the **** with a big gob.

Dont you love me anymore?

Did I ever?

You sound like hudgell trying to cover up for losing 450K a season whilst FC make £300k

Why? my statement is fact, it's part of the SMC user agreement

12,000 paying punters, we do not see 12,000 tickets worth of cash, fact

Yes but have you noticed the lack of progress in ground developments?



The running costs we dont have to pay are probably quite significant.

in basic terms Neil
1 you use the word Fact when you dont know its a fact
b the agreement has risen to 8250ish since we moved in due to it being a cumulative figure over the season and there being less home games.
3.c the agreement includes no costs upto that figure ie, no stewarding costs etc.
d.4 our passes are in real terms (this season anyway) 30% more expensive obviously so due to the stadia. meaning even a similar gat would of given us 30% extra revenue as rovers dont top the 8250 figure(obviously this is due to change with the advert of club Krap)

Don't think the 4 of us will be renewing our passes. Will choose which games to go to.

2 passes NOT BEING RENEWED HERE aswell

Yeah, but that covers the costs of the stadium

Think you missed my point

When Spin Masters Rule and his merry followers come out and say "yay, it's all rosy and cool we have 12,500 fans", just think, due to the mill stone that is the SMC user agreement we have a paying crowd similar to Rovers, rather than Leeds

Out of which we pay no stadium costs, therefore it's actually worth more.

The user agreement cuts both ways.

But we don't need "club Hull FC" to pay for new turnstiles

No, because you rent shiny new ones. I don't want to get into the whole stadium debate, you have the KC and fair play it's a great stadium, but Rovers have to improve facilities and this is one way of doing it. We can't win, you moan about our facilities, yet slag us off when the club try ways to continue improvement of our ground.