Quote PAUL M="PAUL M"Other than Berrigan we don't have a better centre imo.'"
That doesn't make him a good centre. It just highlights a big weakness in our backs.
Quote PAUL M="PAUL M"=#0040FFAnything Yeaman does from a positive perspective is ignored if he makes one bad tackle. What about the 3/4 times in a game where he stops attacks and helps to save tries.'"
This simply isn't true. My main problem with him is with his attacking game in any case.
Quote PAUL M="PAUL M"How many Hull players missed tackles for the two McGuire tries and the disallowed Smith try, are those players being singled out.'"
How many of them bombed two tries? As the title of the thread indicates, he's being singled out for that rather than for his defence.
Yeaman is a solidly average player. His defence is not a weakness particularly but it also isn't as strong as some claim whenever he gets discussed. In attack he is usually dangerous on the end of a short pass near the line but has little else in his armoury. His backing up and general awareness is atrocious for a centre and his pace is borderline.
He'd be decent backup to a proper centre, but should never be first choice in a side hoping to challenge the top sides. His automatic selection despite his distinctly average form for the last four years is a puzzle and a concern, as was the very long contract he was given.
Berrigan played better in one single game than Yeaman has in four seasons.