[quote="Jake the Peg":3hqy4b6b]holmes missed most of last season injured and, lo and behold, is injured again. I doubt we'll get more thank half a dozen games out of him. Sounds like his knee is knackered. chamberlain is just a low quality SL signing. He was a back up at leigh but seemingly first choice here. Not a bad squad signing but as a first choice centre it's hardly inspiring, especially with only one really good 2nd rower in the squad (who is constantly injured). I doubt bonaire is a dobbin, he's too persistent. Most would have got bored of it long before now. If we keep wiining and he's not around then maybe you're right[/quote:3hqy4b6b] Myler says we offered a transfer fee for Cross, I think the club know we need a better centre but it’s finding one available. Holmes might turn out to be a poor signing if he decent get on the field often, but we signed 10 or 11 players in one window bound to be a couple that don’t work out, not many Hull fans won’t think we are at least somewhat heading in the right direction on and off the field, if not 100% perfect. It’s just the constant slagging of players and then using said players to have a pop at ‘Richie Rich’ constantly, that rings alarm bells, again that seems like some sort of personal ventetta or an act. I know some right glass half empty merchants but most seem a little bit happier since Myler has come in. You’d honestly think no DOR at any club has ever made a dud signing before.

I know we're not paying Holmes to be a cheer leader, but the fact Cartwright took him across to the Catalans game says a lot about Holmes' influence on the squad or visa versa. The injuries are a concern, but as has been said plenty of times it's how these older players are influencing those around them 7 days a week, not just for 80 minutes on game day.

I would just like to apologise if I have contributed to squabbling/goading that Chris mentioned. It is important to remember that this is a public forum for everyone to share their views and we're not always going to agree with those views. The world would be a boring place if we always agreed on everything all the time and it's often different viewpoints that make for the more interesting discussions that can take place. That's not just amongst us FC fans but fans of RL in general. I personally find it quite interesting when fans of other clubs join in the discussions, getting an outside opinion on FC matters. So we should be respectful of others rights to post their views. That said, people do need to think more about what they post (not just on here but on social media in general) IMO as it's one thing having the right to express your views but another when you use that right to merely troll and get a bite off people. There's also a fine line of being critical and, to use DSJ1983's terms, slag off and have a pop at others. That line does seem to get crossed far too often and tends to generate certain kind of responses in the same ways as trolling and fishing does. Again, that's not specifically aimed at here but at social media overall. So a bit more thought into what is being posted and how it is responded to needed all round I think.

[quote="Faithful One":qtp7fh5r]I know we're not paying Holmes to be a cheer leader, but the fact Cartwright took him across to the Catalans game says a lot about Holmes' influence on the squad or visa versa. The injuries are a concern, but as has been said plenty of times it's how these older players are influencing those around them 7 days a week, not just for 80 minutes on game day.[/quote:qtp7fh5r] I thought this too. I think that's also one of the reasons we have been willing to take a risk with certain players given their injury statuses. Because we know they are bringing more to the club than just what will be on the field. They seem to have prioritised attitude and character with the signings.

[quote="Roam Ranger":116qw30h]I would just like to apologise if I have contributed to squabbling/goading that Chris mentioned. It is important to remember that this is a public forum for everyone to share their views and we're not always going to agree with those views. The world would be a boring place if we always agreed on everything all the time and it's often different viewpoints that make for the more interesting discussions that can take place. That's not just amongst us FC fans but fans of RL in general. I personally find it quite interesting when fans of other clubs join in the discussions, getting an outside opinion on FC matters. So we should be respectful of others rights to post their views. That said, people do need to think more about what they post (not just on here but on social media in general) IMO as it's one thing having the right to express your views but another when you use that right to merely troll and get a bite off people. There's also a fine line of being critical and, to use DSJ1983's terms, slag off and have a pop at others. That line does seem to get crossed far too often and tends to generate certain kind of responses in the same ways as trolling and fishing does. Again, that's not specifically aimed at here but at social media overall. So a bit more thought into what is being posted and how it is responded to needed all round I think.[/quote:116qw30h] Are you new to the internet? On here is like the garden of eden compared to the likes of X, facebook etc.

[quote="Jake the Peg":1t3d0tad]Are you new to the internet? On here is like the garden of eden compared to the likes of X, facebook etc.[/quote:1t3d0tad] What is this internet you talk about, is it a new fangled thingymajig? Isn't this the letters page of a newspaper/magazine? Seriously though, yes I know here isn't as bad as elsewhere (that's why I referenced social media in general) but I do think that what we have been seeing on here recently is part of a systemic problem across all platforms.

[quote="Roam Ranger":2nrnzwyt]What is this internet you talk about, is it a new fangled thingymajig? Isn't this the letters page of a newspaper/magazine? Seriously though, yes I know here isn't as bad as elsewhere (that's why I referenced social media in general) but I do think that what we have been seeing on here recently is part of a systemic problem across all platforms.[/quote:2nrnzwyt] We all have different filters but I don't really see anything in here I'd class as properly offensive, unless you include accusing people of being rovers supporters if they're not, which is something which has been levelled at me, Disgusting behaviour now I think about it. They should be banned

I didn't get to watch the game Friday I was at another engagement. However, it is now on YouTube and I watched last night. Now I could not help myself but to watch Kendall closely because imo he has a problem with us. Anyway, he made 9 decisions in the 1st half on Friday. 8 went cats way. Imo he winds the players up with his antics and odd decisions. I didn't do the numbers in the 2nd half but I imagine it would have been in Cats favour. Interestingly, he didn't seem to see any late hits on us either.

[quote="JACK DETH":293pq4jz]I didn't get to watch the game Friday I was at another engagement. However, it is now on YouTube and I watched last night. Now I could not help myself but to watch Kendall closely because imo he has a problem with us. Anyway, he made 9 decisions in the 1st half on Friday. 8 went cats way. Imo he winds the players up with his antics and odd decisions. I didn't do the numbers in the 2nd half but I imagine it would have been in Cats favour. Interestingly, he didn't seem to see any late hits on us either.[/quote:293pq4jz] I think criticism of the referee is an understandable concept. I dont think they are biased one way or another maybe just inept at times. I would imagine that super league standings are on the merits of the teams not due to refs decisions.. I think all teams get bum decisions at some point in the season. We were second bottom last season because we were awful. That said green card decisions need looking at On disrespectful posting. if comments can be directed to the posts rather than the character of the poster that would be helpful. this forum in generally peaceful. HDMs comments can be very childlike. Thankfully less rovers fans have posted on hull articles as we have had a good start to the season

[quote="JACK DETH":1ayw9yhf]I didn't get to watch the game Friday I was at another engagement. However, it is now on YouTube and I watched last night. [/quote:1ayw9yhf] Are you sure? I can't find it!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh0uzjSPZz8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh0uzjSPZz8

Lane has picked up a grade C charge or 5 points in new money .

[quote="B0NES":2fx63c2r]Lane has picked up a grade C charge or 5 points in new money .[/quote:2fx63c2r] For what? Any others? What about catalans? I can't see anything online from the RFL yet

[quote="Jake the Peg":3dq6wvi1]For what? Any others? What about catalans? I can't see anything online from the RFL yet[/quote:3dq6wvi1] Dangerous throw/lift apparently.

3 charges in one game is poor and that's 5 in 2 games. We really need to improve our discipline

[quote="Jake the Peg":2yc0uvcd]3 charges in one game is poor and that's 5 in 2 games. We really need to improve our discipline[/quote:2yc0uvcd] you cant say that Jake its criticising the players

Half expected the Lane tip on Navarrette during the game. The Rapana charge is for the pen in the match which was a rubbish call at the time. No clue on Bourouh

[quote="Jake the Peg":38yfs8c5]We all have different filters but I don't really see anything in here I'd class as properly offensive, unless you include accusing people of being rovers supporters if they're not, which is something which has been levelled at me, Disgusting behaviour now I think about it. They should be banned[/quote:38yfs8c5] It shows how blinkered some are on here when they point the finger and accuse you of being a Rovers supporter. You have 30,000 posts over 18 years I have 8000 posts over 11 years Of course we are Rovers supporters

[quote="bonaire":1d10klk7]It shows how blinkered some are on here when they point the finger and accuse you of being a Rovers supporter. You have 30,000 posts over 18 years I have 8000 posts over 11 years Of course we are Rovers supporters[/quote:1d10klk7] Please give it a ing rest. You've already been asked twice by Chris.

[quote="Jake the Peg":2tomrwnc]For what? Any others? What about catalans? I can't see anything online from the RFL yet[/quote:2tomrwnc] I don't seem to remember the Lane incident at all , I said at the time Rapana will probably cop something for the use of the knees .

[quote="Roam Ranger":z8ud7uxl]I would just like to apologise if I have contributed to squabbling/goading that Chris mentioned. It is important to remember that this is a public forum for everyone to share their views and we're not always going to agree with those views. The world would be a boring place if we always agreed on everything all the time and it's often different viewpoints that make for the more interesting discussions that can take place. That's not just amongst us FC fans but fans of RL in general. I personally find it quite interesting when fans of other clubs join in the discussions, getting an outside opinion on FC matters. So we should be respectful of others rights to post their views. That said, people do need to think more about what they post (not just on here but on social media in general) IMO as it's one thing having the right to express your views but another when you use that right to merely troll and get a bite off people. There's also a fine line of being critical and, to use DSJ1983's terms, slag off and have a pop at others. That line does seem to get crossed far too often and tends to generate certain kind of responses in the same ways as trolling and fishing does. Again, that's not specifically aimed at here but at social media overall. So a bit more thought into what is being posted and how it is responded to needed all round I think.[/quote:z8ud7uxl] Your post has prompted me to show part of a private message that was sent to me several days ago Hi I don't use the forum much now due to the bullying tactics of ( name deleted) who is very limited in his black and white specs, and (name deleted) Keep on giving your views, i know a lot of us agree with, but most on the forum refuse to even consider. Now i dont know this person only his user name and of course there will be people on here who say thats Bull crap and im making it up but im certain the mods have access to our PMs otherwise we could send all sorts of insults to members so if you are one of them PM Chris and ask if the post is genuine or not. I obviously cant name the two he is talking about suffice to say they are both very high on the reputation numbers The point of the post is to remember that some people are far more sensitive than others and this kind of thing which he calls bullying can be to some a danger to their metal health and wellbeing and seems to have stopped him from posting which is a shame when it should be to some a form of enjoyment and communication with others about their team and club. If you wish to poo poo this thats fine with me i can handle it but remember there are obviously others who cant. I dont know the background of whats gone on in the past with him and the two members he has named but all i will say they should be ashamed of themselves

[quote="B0NES":3jduk1zs]I don't seem to remember the Lane incident at all , I said at the time Rapana will probably cop something for the use of the knees .[/quote:3jduk1zs] I don’t at all either?,and if that’s use of the knees Tomkins should have copped a ban nearly every week for the last 17 years

[quote="mwindass":3lhffl4w]Half expected the Lane tip on Navarrette during the game. The Rapana charge is for the pen in the match which was a rubbish call at the time. No clue on Bourouh[/quote:3lhffl4w] To fair there wasn’t a lot Lane could have done once the tackle was well under effect, likely he’s been given the charge grading he has due to Navarette failing his HIA. Think the RFL, Officials and SL Head Coaches may well need a discussion on the way some of the new system is being implemented. Yet nothing for any of the late hits on Cust or Sezer and not even a grade A charge for Cotric (I think) with the high shot on Cust while scoring the try in the corner. I’m actually a little surprise they’ve not found anything to ping Ligi for Also thought the way the green cards were given out was pretty poor and the attitude of Kendall and manner he approached it with the players was poor, he seems to have chip on his shoulder, but no change there.

Did anyone know that if you get a charge worth over 3 points, once you pay your fine only half of the points tarif stays on your record? Who the hell made this stuff up? Its bizarre

[quote="Jake the Peg":39rt0b5o]Did anyone know that if you get a charge worth over 3 points, once you pay your fine only half of the points tarif stays on your record? Who the hell made this stuff up? Its bizarre[/quote:39rt0b5o] So Lane will only get 2.5 points if the fine is paid yet Rapana would still be on 3 for a lesser offence? That can’t be true