Really don't see why people are saying prop is a must next, We'll have Hame, Dowes, Maloney, Radford, Fitz and hopefully Thackray. A top class right centre is where we need to be looking.

Fitz is 2nd row, so primarily is Hame

Out of Dowes, Maloney and Thacks, there is only Thacks who runs at pace at the line and brakes a tackle, so a tackle busting prop is what we need.

Briscoe is primarily a centre, and was playing awesome before his unfortunate injury. Why not put him there?

I thought so too, but I don't think that he ever got a record. The charges were dropped

Not anymore he's not, and Hame is being brought across as an impact prop.

Lynch as a prop is better than all of those mentioned, if available and he wants to come we should be going all out to get him here.

If he isnt available I would only sign a top prop.

I see FB as the main priority for next season now.

Fitz has been playing in the backrow for the Roosters this season, certainly the last couple of games.

I agree if we can get Lynch.

I think Fitz and Hame are, or should be in the second row. We'll see I guess

Ftiz plays exactly the same role Radford does for us for the Roosters in that he is basically a prop except Fitz plays the full 80.

Hame is like Jamie Peacock in that you can play him at either prop or second rower and you wont be able to tell the difference in the way he plays. I reckon next season we will see Hame, Radford and Fitz all rotating as props be it at 8, 10 or 13.

What gives you that idea?!

He's coming to Hull as a 2nd Row, not as a prop

By watching how he plays.

Fitz plays EXACTLY same role?!

hmmmm...

Agree with the Hame/JP comment though.

Thing is if you look at our back row options we won't need him to pack down there and play prop.