To be fair Paul has remained consistant in accepting that Agar will remain, without necessarily being in favour of that reality. He's far from a "lover".

What is interesting is the few that seriosuly are up Agar's backside that simply don't post anymore.

That thought's crossed my mind this morning too. Has anyone checked under Humber Bridge?

See Standee's post



I have consistently said he should not be here next season but have stated I believe he will.

It wasn't aimed at you. I was agreeing with your post in that there has been a detectable change in sentiment as the more balanced posters see further shocking selection blunders and a team incapable of catching and holding the ball parade their skills in France.

I know that and where did I call him a 'lover' ? I don't need lessons from you in name calling thanks all the same

And the ones that have posted appear to have seen what manty of us have been saying for a while now.

Results or sheer incompetence?

Well, considering you quoted PaulM and posted "even the Agar lovers have turned" I think, on refection, you maybe did.

I know you don't need lessons in name calling, we've both been doing it for years!

The really sad thing is, Agar will be head coach at Hull FC next season, and nothing any of us do or say will change that. To get rid of him would mean someone admitting a mistake, neither Kath nor any of our other incumbents have the humility to be able to do so.

It's like when you email them and you get the automated response "We'll be in touch, if appropraite to do so", may as well have posted me back a picture of Jimmy's backside!

staffs fc is a turned lover. He's coming to realise I am right about everything

I think you'll find many of us questioned Agar's appointment long before you (in this persona) joined us Jake.

I think, on reflection, you should for once remove your head from the deepest recesses of your ar$e and think about that again. I was agreeing with what he was saying - that is he noted that Agar's job was increasingly under pressure and I noted that even the "Agar lovers" were changing their mind. That doesn't refer to him - I was merely agreeing. As for the term "Agar lovers" I was simply using a term oft used by silly name callers such as yourself.



Your are confusing me with Jake





Agreed he will be here next year although again, like Paul said, I think it is more difficult this week than ever before for the hierarchy to defend him.



They can't do that due to bandwidth limitations.

Wrong

Never a name caller, sycophant!







I wouldn't be that cruel!





But they still will, like I have said, to do otherwise would be to admit a mistake, and none of them have the humility to do so.



Small mercies!

Fookin rubarb he should of bin out ages ago

I think you'll find he was only appointed a year and 2 months after I joined (in this persona) standee

There you go again, you'll learn

And many of us said it was a garbage decision on day one! (Agar, not you joining us!)

Me 3