As a neutral I thought the VR had no choice but to stay with the on-field call. Overall I thought Hull were badly done to on the penalties with some of the interference ones being ridiculous in comparison to the way Wigan mess around at the PTB.

Anyway, the right team won so well done and enjoy the final.

I wasn't a try. From the angles on TV it simply wasn't it was a fraction too short.
It went up as a no try and conclusive proof was needed for it to be given.

I think if ellis had jumped up celebrating and thrown the ball in the air he'd have given it, as it was, ellis got up to play the ball so no surprise thaler didn't give it

ok that looks conclusive - but the zoomed image was not shown in TV ...

So you think the try was disallowed because it was broadcast on the BBC . It wouldn't have made any difference if it was on Sky.

Ellis was miles short of the whitewash .

Ellis had a mike on him and he said on field that he was short and no try. But it's obviously a bent ref and cheating wigan's fault it wasn't given!

i thought the v/r might have given benefit of the doubt to ellis.the ball was definately touching the white wash.

Not easy to speak, I'm banned from your board. Like so many others.

I meant neutral in the sense that you have no affinity to either team.

Thought this was a true 50/50 decision. Had it been sent up as a try it most likely would have been given, but with the initial decision being no try there wasn't sufficient evidence to overturn. Not sure if the VR had access to the super-zoom images as he seemed to struggle throughout the match to get quality angles and footage.

I've certainly seen far worse tries awarded.

Anyway,makes no difference we won and thats all that matters.Sounds as though you had a restless night,think you can still buy gripe water

I think had he just continued his line and not tried to step tomkins, he'd have scored