I appreciate this will not be given a lot of credence and I understand why, but Lauaki has had his visa application rejected. It is not a problem with him as such but his application was not up to standard and he has not therefor attained the number of points required. These applications, in which I include Crockers, are being turned down because the paperwork is not being submitted correctly - end of.

Welcome to two weeks ago.

Crockers was not turned down because of the paperwork submitted and im sure we will find that out in the near future when he gets the full reason in the mail.

It hasnt been rejected has it?

Can you show up proof of this?

With 1 post i would take everything he says with a pinch of salt.

Initial application turned down due to being filled in incorrectly by his agent, apparantly.

If is my understanding that if Crocker had submitted his application with all the correct paperwork in the required order he would have attained the points required and his application would have been granted. As I say it is only my understanding.

This is partially correct, a form that should have been submitted to give him the required amount of points wasn't, hence rejection.

Your understanding is wrong

no news as of yet

ive heard somewhere that he had to submit a form to prove that he was english speaking or was that in one of my elaborate dreams

I am more than willing to accept I might be, but I am still of the belief that if the paperwork had been submitted more proffessionally it would have stood a greater chance of being accepted.

For Crocker's second application, the club employed legal advisors and included character references from a wide variety of sources. Perhaps you could enlighten us as to the specific administrative shortcomings.