I don't understand rovers fans need to come on here too.

It's merely another aspect of their all round general obsession with the City's premier club!


They're always obsessed with us. You would think with everything that has happened over the past two/three years (them putting their first decent side together in forty years, us losing our way in fairly spectacular fashion) they would be too interested in enjoying watching their top of the table side, but no, even in this scenario the object of their obsession remains us, always the premier club.


They can't help themselves, but then lifetime addictions can be very hard to change!!

I don’t understand why anyone bothers reading what they say?

The ones on here I have on ignore and I never visit their forum.


They are going to slag our players off the same way we slag theirs.

That’s how I see it. Seen loads of people saying it was a shoulder to the head but for me there was no contact with the head. If there was, at that speed & force you go off for a HIA & you certainly don’t get up & carry on your run. Refs got it wrong for me, shoulder charge yes but not to the head.

Jack Smith penalised Adam Khieran against Wire for turning his shoulder in the tackle, it’s still a shoulder charge. Knight was a shoulder charge with force but still no contact to the head. On reflection “ing embarrassing “ from Knight sums it up for me. 

Not that long ago, Knights tackle wouldn't have made the fuss it has now and the Huddersfield player would have got straight up and played the ball. 
The game now has created situations we're players are now staying down  knowing full well the tackle will be reviewed with a chance of obtaining a penalty and sin bin. 

Can anyone tell me why Eseh was sin binned? No head high but the second attempt on the floor was to the ribs?

Rovers fans are all devastated as they thought we were gone and they had a clear run in the city and now we're considerably richer than them

He did get straightness and carried on