Quote: Dave K. "You can, be you are letting your bias take over here. They are backing their players word, despite there being zero evidence.
We have had this go against us with Griffin that I had to accept even with my supposed black and white glasses on.'"
No I'm trying not to be biased, I've never said that he's guilty.
I was more interested in the evidence that London put forward, they must have thought it was worth submitting, yet the RFL have classed it as contradictory, obviously London don't think it is
I'd forgotten about the Griffin incident tbh, the RFL are always going to take the word of the ref though,
Anyway I doubt it'll go any further so let's leave it there