Did you actually see the incident? What did you see??

The disciplinary panel saw it the way it was.....

Case Number: ON/503/21
Name: Josh Griffin
Details of allegation: Dangerous Contact in the 23rd minute
Decision: Charge
Details of Charge /
Reason for NFA:
Law 15.1 (i)
Dangerous Contact - Defender uses any part of their body
forcefully to twist, bend or otherwise apply pressure to the
limb or limbs of an opposing player in a way that involves an
unacceptable risk of injury to that player.
Grade C
Penalty Notice: 2 Match Penalty Notice

No disparaging claims there then!!

I’ve just read that the disciplinary ruled that there was no shoulder charge in the Savellio incident, as I said earlier it depends what you want to see as opposed to what actually happens.

My last post on this subject..........

I was watching on TV and so I accept that I had a better view of the incident than you would have at the match - you didn't see it - the commentators didn't mention it - the officials didn't see anything wrong with it.. but clearly that doesn't mean that it didn't happen - it did! I originally posted my belief that Griffin was "guilty" to use your terminology - the Disciplinary committee looked at the incident and also decided that he was "guilty". I don't know what's disparaging about that! It will clearly be non-productive to point out the irony of you making the totally disparaging comment about the supposed high tackles that Saints got away with - it obviously depends on what you want to see (to quote!!)

I never mentioned Savelio - get a grip!

Thought the post before last was “ the last post on this subject” you get a grip.
Another super fan who doesn’t go to games, put your socks back on your feet, keyboard warrior.