Don't know why some get their knickers in a twist about the KC. If the council own it we'll be tenants. If the Allams own it we'll be tenants. What's the difference?

For those that think the Allams are bad guys answer me one question, will they want to lose a revenue stream if they own the stadium by alienating FC?

Maybe thats due to lack of current facilities though

what facilities does Hull lack?

rlInterestingrl
Certainly seems to have the financial clout.

what you are worth on paper is meaningless, you need assets to borrow against, Allam doesn't have many.

whether the allams buy the kc or not, neither hull city nor hull fc could afford to keep that stadium afloat alone.

the allams will want to make asmuch money as humanly possivle, if they buy the stadium then the £100m plus on the "sports village" it would take alot of fans through the gates (aswell as the cafe, pool etc) to get that money back and earn profits.

allam is a hull fan...(all sports) FC, KR and City fan, so he won't throw anyone out etc...

2 reasons there, no need to worry.

End Of Thread