Agree, Hall has had a frustrating couple of years, but there is no doubt he has talent, and he had a good game tonight.
What I can`t understand is why we bought Turner, to get rid of Hall. I live over in Lancs. and the Salford fans I talk to can`t understand why we bought him! Hall is a better footballer, he has more pace, he is capable of winning us a game with a try out of nothing, his field kicking is good, and he is a very good goalkicker. True his defence is poor, but so is Turner`s.
I`m not sure whether Hall should go or not, he could become a really good player, but I am sure that Turner will never become anything better than ordinary at Super League level.

I honestly don't think the club can be held responsible for not harnessing their 'potential' as none of these players have gone on and done [ianything[/i of note after leaving.
I also don't think there's a problem with keeping said players a little while longer to see if they make the grade. 'IF' they're not taking someone else's place at the club, in hindsight none of these players have hindered the progress of other players; they've had mostly bit part involvement.

The main problem for me is that there’s no one else pushing them out of the squad/team earlier.

40 tries in 72 appearances during our most woeful time in SL would suggest he will do well in a team that has a better defensive structure than our own. At his best in attack certainly not far off Sam Tompkins, with a proper coach he may well do very nicely. All those saying he is Championship material are fools!

Even in attack he has lots work to do, poor handling and choices need improving along with strenght.

Apart from the odd moment of skill in the last 2 years I haven't seen anything from him apart from walk in trys.

Morning, Craig/Craig's Mam.