On trial at Cas! Could come back and bite us on the bum.

Why?

So to avoid that then we never let a player go?

Come on, he’s a decent player but he’s not an Ellis or Solomona.

I don't think we need to make any kind of issue out of this, teams and clubs move on.

Personally, I’m happy for the lad.

What's he done wrong?

Good luck to him, he never let us down and it was our decision to not offer him a contract. With regards the two names mentioned we let Ellis go whilst we could obtain some benefit because he was willing to see out his contract but would then be a free agent at which point he had indicated he would leave. With regards Solomona his contract was up so we did not release him he chose to go. In both these cases it was the players who decided to leave not the club.

Great signing by Cas. He will improve them in key positions and win games for them. He will score and create tries, his support play will as ever confirm his natural ability to just read the game perfectly. Add to that his proven durability and you have a first class SL player. Will be interesting to see how many games Glasskill is fit for compared to Rocky over the period of time Rocky is at Cas.

You may be right but probably wrong but try to move on and back the team, not the player.

Whether Gaskell is or isn't a sick note he's a superior player.

One thing is for sure, Radford will take all the joy out of his game.

He is only a superior player if he plays. I would hope he would finally be fit this week because I believe it was stated he would be about two weeks and that was after the first game. If he doesn’t play this week then we are entering when will he play again because 60 minutes in five games is not a good return on investment.
With regards Radford how many of us have endured working with people we don’t like because it’s work and we get paid.

Do you say the same about Tom Johnstone? Ditto Reece or Max this year, Tupou? Where does it stop. He picked up a legitimate injury, it’s how it goes, there is no conspiracy.

Why all the concern, If everybody's fit where does he play anyway?.

I didn’t say there was a conspiracy but I merely pointed out the Gaskell is only a superior player if he is playing rather than sitting in the stand. What we were discussing was the fact that it was the club’s choice to let him go and not his which was different to the two examples you gave. I know you defend the club at every turn including the lights but I am afraid that they do not get everything correct and time will tell.

Never let us down on the pitch , suspect him and his agents valuation we’re different to the clubs. If club had wanted him they would have signed him! Pleased that he had deal

So if Gaskel is fit were is he going to play ,good Question

That's not true. Ellis wasn't looking for a move. He explained that on his podcast.

Apparently he is fit. Depends whether we play Escare on the wing and put Kay back to hooker.

He's on trial isnt he?, that's not a deal yet.
If he was the messiah that some think he is he would have just been signed.