rlhttp://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/story-13480590-detail/story.html?rl
Contridiction?



Then

Just sounds to me like they don't have to get rid but they would like to.

What's the big deal? There are existing players in front of him for a place so better for him if he leaves and better for Hull to save his salary.
But they are not trying to free a quota spot as they are chasing a non quota player as new signing.

What's wrong with that?

I hope we get him.....as long as he isn't the big half back signing.

Think its more to do with his chances in the first team are going to be limited and they'd like to free up some cap space to spend elsewhere on the squad. But if he's to come back here i'd prefer him to get his british passport sorted and come off quota so we can fit in two QUALITY overseas halfbacks and Tongia.

If he's going to come our way I hope we're clever enough to make Hull pay part of his wages, if they don't we should tell them to keep him and they can pay all his wages.

dont want him he was all too quick to jump ship unlike Murphy not a halfback we have cover at hooker and hes too old

FFS he did not jump ship

i think you're miles off with the first bit, but agree 100% with the rest.

You were in administration and they chose to sell him to bring in some much needed revenue to keep you lot afloat(all before glover agreed the takeover).Hull made the offer and the administrator snapped their hands off.As of now,he is well down the pecking order,in both the 7 and 9 role,and with hull looking to bring an aussie centre in,his quota place is needed.Sam did a great job this season for us,but we have recruited well,so his chances would be very limited.

I'm not sure that's true.

Of the players who departed whilst we were in administration, only one was sold by the administrator - the rest went of their own accord. That's my understanding if it, formed by reading the administrator's report, which you would assume is the truth.

The sale was agreed " in principle" with Hull FC before the administration and was concluded after the Administrators were appointed.

HTH

Why doesn't anyone want him back? He was a great player and if signed for another year would win quite a few MOM accolades IMO. Great tackler, good runs from dummy half and his support play is better than the tripe we displayed this season (to be fair we didn't break very often).

The Administrator sold both Obst and Ferguson to recoup their costs as the cupboards were bare,only Millard was not sold by them. How do I know? Peter O'Hara the administrator told me.

In short 100% every time but not good enough to play halfback and not big enough to play hooker I say let him stay on Hulls salary cap