May I take this opportunity to thank the administrator for his help in Killing Wakefield Trinity, along with good old Ted, sleep well tonight boys.

It is not the fault of the administrator that money needs to be raised to keep the club afloat. They are trying to keep it alive to sell, not kill it. That's not how administraton works.

where one goes another will replace him, at the moment we are just getting the best prices for what we have

I hope O'Hara's are dealing with the repossessed house that I have just put a silly offer in for this morning. He might accept it, touch wood.

The majority of you wanted administration.
This is what happens and before anyone mentions it the diffrence between you and Crusaders is that they had the ground as collateral you dont have that from what I can tell.
Some people warned you but it was just laughed off.
You cannot now complain because it doesn't suit you.

You have made your point (a few times). We get your message.

No kindly jog on, you aren't helping!!!!

I don't think some are getting the point though. The situation we are in is not due to the administrators, yet they are getting blamed for doing their job.

If only more had seen the BBC documentary on the long administration Hull KR were in, they may understand that tough decisions have to be made to keep the company trading.

I agree, but Roverswall doesnt need to keep drumming the point home, it isnt helping an already depressing forum!!

Anyway you can keep reminding people, its not quite as annoying!

I can understand the need to sell in case of an extended administration process, but wholesale pillage when an agreement to sell is in place is not required, the sale with assets intact should the main priority - concentrate on the blockage in the system - RFL.
The Crusaders may have had collateral in the ground but this does not pay any bills in the administration period.
And Roverswall - blaming anyone but WTWC ?? is not what is going on, not one person would argue the fact that the previous administration caused all this, the continuation is at the hands of the Administrators and the RFL

On last years form, we won't miss Ferguson. Obst is different, but once Smith arrives and BJ and Davey are available, I am not sure it will be a problem.

I'll be more disappointed if we lost some of the younger players, like Murphy and Gledhill.

Nobody wanted it, there was absolutely no alternative.

My take on is that we are losing some of the better players but as long as it keeps the club a going concern in the interim it’s a price worth paying. As long as these players are replaced by loans or players out of favour on one year deals when the new board are in place then we can look forward not back.

can't blame the administrators. They are just doing there job. It sucks that we are losing players but there is nothing we can do about it

Well if it annoys you, why not leave our forum and go back to your own. We can look after our own people, thank you.

This all depends on the terms of the agreement with SO1873. If the Adminisdtrators have agreed in principal to sell to SO1873, they will have an agreement on what assets are included in that sale. If the administrator then sells some of those assets out from under SO1873 there may something going on that we are not (and TBH never will) be a party to.

It may also depend who the main creditor is. Usually an administrator is appointed by the main creditor (usually a Bank, but not always). We know that HMRC are owed 300,000 or so, and I can see no mention of a bank being owed anything (but we don't know). The other main creditor will Ted. Make of that what you will.

(Just adding my support here, I am a Cas fan, but TBH I am disgusted at what is going with the club - best of luck, I hope the club comes out of this okay).