FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > Who is Janet Bennett? |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
It would appear that NOMINET have got the NIMBY's to change the illegal domain registration and take it out of Ted Richardson name... but the big question is.. who is Janet Bennett and why does she not live in the UK?
I thought getting objections from Kent was taking things a bit far... but now the person who owns the domain
URL: www.heartinternet.co.uk
Relevant dates:
Registered on: 24-Sep-2010
Renewal date: 24-Sep-2012
Last updated: 14-Dec-2010
Registration status:
Registered until renewal date.
Name servers:
ns.mainnameserver.com
ns2.mainnameserver.com
WHOIS lookup made at 21:30:27 16-Dec-2010
|
|
It would appear that NOMINET have got the NIMBY's to change the illegal domain registration and take it out of Ted Richardson name... but the big question is.. who is Janet Bennett and why does she not live in the UK?
I thought getting objections from Kent was taking things a bit far... but now the person who owns the domain
URL: www.heartinternet.co.uk
Relevant dates:
Registered on: 24-Sep-2010
Renewal date: 24-Sep-2012
Last updated: 14-Dec-2010
Registration status:
Registered until renewal date.
Name servers:
ns.mainnameserver.com
ns2.mainnameserver.com
WHOIS lookup made at 21:30:27 16-Dec-2010
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 10926 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2021 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "It would appear that NOMINET have got the NIMBY's to change the illegal domain registration and take it out of Ted Richardson name... but the big question is.. who is Janet Bennett and why does she not live in the UK?
I thought getting objections from Kent was taking things a bit far... but now the person who owns the domain
URL:
You seriously couldn't make this stuff up!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 312 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2014 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Well my friend is called Jan (Janice) Bennett but she wrote in to support ... and certainly would know nothing about websites etc..
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2946 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2017 | Dec 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The wife of Gordon?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 20428 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'm Spartacus!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 456 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2012 | Feb 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "It would appear that NOMINET have got the NIMBY's to change the illegal domain registration and take it out of Ted Richardson name... but the big question is.. who is Janet Bennett and why does she not live in the UK?
I thought getting objections from Kent was taking things a bit far... but now the person who owns the domain
URL:
Give it a rest man all this trying to discredit the "opposition" just discredits you really, what do you think the government officers thought when you sent them your stats about where people live etc, it made you look desperate and condescending.
The fact is anybody with any influence will Look at swag and War the same, people with vested interests, using anything they can to sway a decision. Where WAR have a slight advantage is that they have a right to object on issues such as noise pollution, loss of amenity etc, things that will affect their every day life.
But the main point is this, this will be decided on planning Law, not planning hearsay, or speculation. So you can sling as much mud as you like but it just makes you look pathetic and as underhand as you claim them to be, it matters not who's name is on the Web site, the SOC state has plenty of letters from LOCAL people LOCAL to the development and what ever you say about the guy running WAR I doubt these people took much persuasion to register their objections, and you do them a discredit to think that they cannot see the fact for them selves. This is in Fact the LOCALISM Pickles talks about.
About your gut feeling that it will get passed eventually, you can not have it both ways as you stated very few applications have been called in by this government, so does this not suggest to you that they are only calling in the ones that are the most unsound, and if this is the case why are you so positive of it gettting approval. Also the figure about 75% getting approval would seem irrelevent now as you and SWC said they are not going to waste money on the ones that have a good chance of being passed, so the pass fail ration will surly narrow.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1494 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2011 | Feb 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| "issues such as noise pollution, loss of amenity etc"
Please name these issues. Please state how they cannot be rectified. Please bear in mind loss of amenity hardly applies within this situation as the land is private property & classed by opponents as "contaminated" so hardly somewhere you want to take the kids for a walk and the dog for a paddle! Noise pollution? Sorry have you not noticed the small road to the side of the site, I think it goes by the name of the M62! The same road being overhauled to accommodate new traffic.
The fact is the baseline argument our opponents put up on the 22nd was paper thin, with a legal team examining their arguments with a fine tooth comb in the hearings they will come out for what they are.
How you can talk of "mud slinging" is sickening and laughable. You my friend are pond scum, who only come to gloat when things are bad, what does that say about you as a person? And that's before we look at your motives.
If you actually feel so passionate about NM you should get out from behind the keyboard, get your armour on and meet us at the PI! Because my friend as far as I'm concerned this is WAR.
Wakefield Angry Resident. You bet I am!!!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15521 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2020 | May 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "It would appear that NOMINET have got the NIMBY's to change the illegal domain registration and take it out of Ted Richardson name... but the big question is.. who is Janet Bennett and why does she not live in the UK?
I thought getting objections from Kent was taking things a bit far... but now the person who owns the domain
URL:
Am I the only one who finds this post a little bit sinister...?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: bren2k "Am I the only one who finds this post a little bit sinister...?'"
I think if it was not for the original issue, then possibly yes, but if you are not fully aware of that and that this site domain was originally registered illegally under Ted Richardson's name, then it is not sinister at all... plus it is public record information and if you stick a website up then, whatever that might be for, this is legally required information.
The reason that has become an issue also, is that 'they' have actual gone to so much trouble to conceal their identities and they only changed the original domain for this site from
Quote: bren2k "The current issue we are tackling is the proposed destruction of Green Belt land in Stanley, Wakefield. For the now the website is dedicated to this pressing issue, and will resume to normal in the coming months.'"
Do you mean a website that did not exist until May this year and went live with this subject and only this subject... clever and deliberate choice of words don't you think!
Quote: bren2k "W.A.R (Wakefield Angry Residents) are a group of Wakefield rate payers, who have pooled their intellectual and financial resources to question the public spending by Wakefield Council.
The group was founded by Arthur Murray, who has spent his own time and money to get this group going and inform people about the pressing issues in Wakefield District, with the current most important issue being the proposed destruction of Green Belt land in Stanley.
The group is ever increasing, we now have members from all parts of the Wakefield District , South Leeds and West Yorkshire. We'd like to thank the time all the people and effort of everyone who has contributed.'"
Same lie again, restated and also why do you have members in South Leeds and West Yorkshire (?) when you are a Wakefield Rate payers group? Ok, you are 'currently' tacking the issue of Newmarket but you can't have people from Leeds attacking Wakefield's spending plans in relation to this site, they can moan about the site, but not about this issue... good old Arthur should point them in the direction of Wakefield (and now Leeds) Community Conservation Group if they are from Leeds... but of course, it is the same people and they don't really exist either!
Right, must do some work... I will come back to reply to Rugbyball later... he raises some very good points, some I agree with, some I don't!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 456 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2012 | Feb 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I will be more concise for you SWC. Nobody who has any power gives a poop about this website. The decision will be made in line with planning law. The most damming information against the site comes from statutory responses not the NIMBYS. The spatial planning one is a killer in its self.
And I may well come to the public enquiry as I am sure I could make a much better case than the NIMBYs as you call them did. Having said that I have no real intention of putting a spanner in your works, All along I have just tried to give some balance to your rose tinted view, and up until now I have not been far wrong. You keep flogging your flawed arguments, I have tried to point out the real issues and have just received abuse.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: jonh "I'm Spartacus!'"
No! I'm Spartacus!!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15521 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2020 | May 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "I think if it was not for the original issue, then possibly yes<snip>'"
All of that notwithstanding, publicising the detail seems unnecessary; feels a bit like an attempt to out people, and I'm not sure of the value of that.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1494 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2011 | Feb 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: rugbyball "I will be more concise for you SWC. Nobody who has any power gives a poop about this website. The decision will be made in line with planning law. The most damming information against the site comes from statutory responses not the NIMBYS. The spatial planning one is a killer in its self.
And I may well come to the public enquiry as I am sure I could make a much better case than the NIMBYs as you call them did. Having said that I have no real intention of putting a spanner in your works, All along I have just tried to give some balance to your rose tinted view, and up until now I have not been far wrong. You keep flogging your flawed arguments, I have tried to point out the real issues and have just received abuse.'"
If you were to answer like that you wouldn't last 2 minutes under cross examination.
What loss of amenity? You are not entitled to anything as far as the amenity goes.
Everything else could be mediated. Do you really think that YK will just be sitting back until the PI? I know for a fact they have been working very closely with the HA (the biggest obstacle- including LCC), so it is likely that the HA direction will be lifted before the PI.
NM will happen, mark my words.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: bren2k "All of that notwithstanding, publicising the detail seems unnecessary; feels a bit like an attempt to out people, and I'm not sure of the value of that.'"
I clearly wound not have posted it had it not been for the previous issue, but mainly because it would be pointless, at the end of the day it is just a public record and to be fair, it is just a name and in all probability it is now a false made-up name anyway... which is what whomever (we have a good idea who the real person is) registered the website should have done in the first place instead of trying to be clever.
Also, for me this is still an issue of having some integrity. It is no secret who I am and why I am involved in this supporting the development of Newmarket (despite what the write on the Cas Forum)... it has been posted here several times if you want to do a search so I am not hiding behind anything... would I publish my address and phone number on here, no, but given my name and approximate location has, it would bot be hard to find me now would it! If anyone asked for it I would probably giv
If you believe strongly in something, you should stand up and be counted, so June Fender has my respect even though I disagree with most the stuff she says and does of course!
Equally, I do feel that people are using her integrity to hide behind and she may, or may not, be complicit in that deception.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5782 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: rugbyball "I will be more concise for you SWC. Nobody who has any power gives a poop about this website. The decision will be made in line with planning law. The most damming information against the site comes from statutory responses not the NIMBYS. The spatial planning one is a killer in its self.
And I may well come to the public enquiry as I am sure I could make a much better case than the NIMBYs as you call them did. Having said that I have no real intention of putting a spanner in your works, All along I have just tried to give some balance to your rose tinted view, and up until now I have not been far wrong. You keep flogging your flawed arguments, I have tried to point out the real issues and have just received abuse.'"
'All along I have just tried to give some balance to your rose tinted view, and up until now I have not been far wrong'
What a load of rubbish, the one thing that you've not shown, ever on this subject is balance. You have never seen any of the benefits of the development or advantages that this could bring to a City like Wakefield and to be honest, I don't think you have ever wanted to. People that bring a balanced point of view,don't just pop up when their is bad news or no news, which is what you've done, and put the boot in.I don't know what your angle has been in all this but you've always come over as a NIMBY yourself, nothing more nothing less.
|
|
|
|
|
|