FORUMS FORUMS



  
FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > Who is Janet Bennett?
18 posts in 2 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, PopTart , kinleycat , Wildthing
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4259
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2020Feb 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



It would appear that NOMINET have got the NIMBY's to change the illegal domain registration and take it out of Ted Richardson name... but the big question is.. who is Janet Bennett and why does she not live in the UK?

I thought getting objections from Kent was taking things a bit far... but now the person who owns the domain URL: www.heartinternet.co.uk

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 24-Sep-2010
Renewal date: 24-Sep-2012
Last updated: 14-Dec-2010

Registration status:
Registered until renewal date.

Name servers:
ns.mainnameserver.com
ns2.mainnameserver.com

WHOIS lookup made at 21:30:27 16-Dec-2010
It would appear that NOMINET have got the NIMBY's to change the illegal domain registration and take it out of Ted Richardson name... but the big question is.. who is Janet Bennett and why does she not live in the UK?

I thought getting objections from Kent was taking things a bit far... but now the person who owns the domain URL: www.heartinternet.co.uk

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 24-Sep-2010
Renewal date: 24-Sep-2012
Last updated: 14-Dec-2010

Registration status:
Registered until renewal date.

Name servers:
ns.mainnameserver.com
ns2.mainnameserver.com

WHOIS lookup made at 21:30:27 16-Dec-2010


TRB
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach10926
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Dec 2021Feb 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "It would appear that NOMINET have got the NIMBY's to change the illegal domain registration and take it out of Ted Richardson name... but the big question is.. who is Janet Bennett and why does she not live in the UK?

I thought getting objections from Kent was taking things a bit far... but now the person who owns the domain URL:
You seriously couldn't make this stuff up! icon_rolleyes.gif

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach312No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2014Oct 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Well my friend is called Jan (Janice) Bennett but she wrote in to support ... and certainly would know nothing about websites etc.. icon_lol.gif

PHe
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2946No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200619 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Dec 2017Dec 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



The wife of Gordon?

RankPostsTeam
International Board Member20428No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200322 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



I'm Spartacus!

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach456No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Mar 2012Feb 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "It would appear that NOMINET have got the NIMBY's to change the illegal domain registration and take it out of Ted Richardson name... but the big question is.. who is Janet Bennett and why does she not live in the UK?

I thought getting objections from Kent was taking things a bit far... but now the person who owns the domain URL:
Give it a rest man all this trying to discredit the "opposition" just discredits you really, what do you think the government officers thought when you sent them your stats about where people live etc, it made you look desperate and condescending.

The fact is anybody with any influence will Look at swag and War the same, people with vested interests, using anything they can to sway a decision. Where WAR have a slight advantage is that they have a right to object on issues such as noise pollution, loss of amenity etc, things that will affect their every day life.

But the main point is this, this will be decided on planning Law, not planning hearsay, or speculation. So you can sling as much mud as you like but it just makes you look pathetic and as underhand as you claim them to be, it matters not who's name is on the Web site, the SOC state has plenty of letters from LOCAL people LOCAL to the development and what ever you say about the guy running WAR I doubt these people took much persuasion to register their objections, and you do them a discredit to think that they cannot see the fact for them selves. This is in Fact the LOCALISM Pickles talks about.

About your gut feeling that it will get passed eventually, you can not have it both ways as you stated very few applications have been called in by this government, so does this not suggest to you that they are only calling in the ones that are the most unsound, and if this is the case why are you so positive of it gettting approval. Also the figure about 75% getting approval would seem irrelevent now as you and SWC said they are not going to waste money on the ones that have a good chance of being passed, so the pass fail ration will surly narrow.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach1494No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Feb 2011Feb 2011LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



"issues such as noise pollution, loss of amenity etc"

Please name these issues. Please state how they cannot be rectified. Please bear in mind loss of amenity hardly applies within this situation as the land is private property & classed by opponents as "contaminated" so hardly somewhere you want to take the kids for a walk and the dog for a paddle! Noise pollution? Sorry have you not noticed the small road to the side of the site, I think it goes by the name of the M62! The same road being overhauled to accommodate new traffic.

The fact is the baseline argument our opponents put up on the 22nd was paper thin, with a legal team examining their arguments with a fine tooth comb in the hearings they will come out for what they are.

How you can talk of "mud slinging" is sickening and laughable. You my friend are pond scum, who only come to gloat when things are bad, what does that say about you as a person? And that's before we look at your motives.

If you actually feel so passionate about NM you should get out from behind the keyboard, get your armour on and meet us at the PI! Because my friend as far as I'm concerned this is WAR.

Wakefield Angry Resident. You bet I am!!!

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach15521
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2020May 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "It would appear that NOMINET have got the NIMBY's to change the illegal domain registration and take it out of Ted Richardson name... but the big question is.. who is Janet Bennett and why does she not live in the UK?

I thought getting objections from Kent was taking things a bit far... but now the person who owns the domain URL:
Am I the only one who finds this post a little bit sinister...?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4259
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2020Feb 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: bren2k "Am I the only one who finds this post a little bit sinister...?'"


I think if it was not for the original issue, then possibly yes, but if you are not fully aware of that and that this site domain was originally registered illegally under Ted Richardson's name, then it is not sinister at all... plus it is public record information and if you stick a website up then, whatever that might be for, this is legally required information.

The reason that has become an issue also, is that 'they' have actual gone to so much trouble to conceal their identities and they only changed the original domain for this site from
Quote: bren2k "The current issue we are tackling is the proposed destruction of Green Belt land in Stanley, Wakefield. For the now the website is dedicated to this pressing issue, and will resume to normal in the coming months.'"


Do you mean a website that did not exist until May this year and went live with this subject and only this subject... clever and deliberate choice of words don't you think!

Quote: bren2k "W.A.R (Wakefield Angry Residents) are a group of Wakefield rate payers, who have pooled their intellectual and financial resources to question the public spending by Wakefield Council.

The group was founded by Arthur Murray, who has spent his own time and money to get this group going and inform people about the pressing issues in Wakefield District, with the current most important issue being the proposed destruction of Green Belt land in Stanley.

The group is ever increasing, we now have members from all parts of the Wakefield District , South Leeds and West Yorkshire. We'd like to thank the time all the people and effort of everyone who has contributed.'"


Same lie again, restated and also why do you have members in South Leeds and West Yorkshire (?) when you are a Wakefield Rate payers group? Ok, you are 'currently' tacking the issue of Newmarket but you can't have people from Leeds attacking Wakefield's spending plans in relation to this site, they can moan about the site, but not about this issue... good old Arthur should point them in the direction of Wakefield (and now Leeds) Community Conservation Group if they are from Leeds... but of course, it is the same people and they don't really exist either!

Right, must do some work... I will come back to reply to Rugbyball later... he raises some very good points, some I agree with, some I don't!

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach456No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Mar 2012Feb 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



I will be more concise for you SWC. Nobody who has any power gives a poop about this website. The decision will be made in line with planning law. The most damming information against the site comes from statutory responses not the NIMBYS. The spatial planning one is a killer in its self.

And I may well come to the public enquiry as I am sure I could make a much better case than the NIMBYs as you call them did. Having said that I have no real intention of putting a spanner in your works, All along I have just tried to give some balance to your rose tinted view, and up until now I have not been far wrong. You keep flogging your flawed arguments, I have tried to point out the real issues and have just received abuse.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach9974
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Feb 2019Feb 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: jonh "I'm Spartacus!'"

No! I'm Spartacus!!

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach15521
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2020May 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "I think if it was not for the original issue, then possibly yes<snip>'"


All of that notwithstanding, publicising the detail seems unnecessary; feels a bit like an attempt to out people, and I'm not sure of the value of that.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach1494No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Feb 2011Feb 2011LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: rugbyball "I will be more concise for you SWC. Nobody who has any power gives a poop about this website. The decision will be made in line with planning law. The most damming information against the site comes from statutory responses not the NIMBYS. The spatial planning one is a killer in its self.

And I may well come to the public enquiry as I am sure I could make a much better case than the NIMBYs as you call them did. Having said that I have no real intention of putting a spanner in your works, All along I have just tried to give some balance to your rose tinted view, and up until now I have not been far wrong. You keep flogging your flawed arguments, I have tried to point out the real issues and have just received abuse.'"


If you were to answer like that you wouldn't last 2 minutes under cross examination.
What loss of amenity? You are not entitled to anything as far as the amenity goes.
Everything else could be mediated. Do you really think that YK will just be sitting back until the PI? I know for a fact they have been working very closely with the HA (the biggest obstacle- including LCC), so it is likely that the HA direction will be lifted before the PI.

NM will happen, mark my words.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4259
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2020Feb 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: bren2k "All of that notwithstanding, publicising the detail seems unnecessary; feels a bit like an attempt to out people, and I'm not sure of the value of that.'"


I clearly wound not have posted it had it not been for the previous issue, but mainly because it would be pointless, at the end of the day it is just a public record and to be fair, it is just a name and in all probability it is now a false made-up name anyway... which is what whomever (we have a good idea who the real person is) registered the website should have done in the first place instead of trying to be clever.

Also, for me this is still an issue of having some integrity. It is no secret who I am and why I am involved in this supporting the development of Newmarket (despite what the write on the Cas Forum)... it has been posted here several times if you want to do a search so I am not hiding behind anything... would I publish my address and phone number on here, no, but given my name and approximate location has, it would bot be hard to find me now would it! If anyone asked for it I would probably giv

If you believe strongly in something, you should stand up and be counted, so June Fender has my respect even though I disagree with most the stuff she says and does of course! icon_wink.gif

Equally, I do feel that people are using her integrity to hide behind and she may, or may not, be complicit in that deception.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach5782
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: rugbyball "I will be more concise for you SWC. Nobody who has any power gives a poop about this website. The decision will be made in line with planning law. The most damming information against the site comes from statutory responses not the NIMBYS. The spatial planning one is a killer in its self.

And I may well come to the public enquiry as I am sure I could make a much better case than the NIMBYs as you call them did. Having said that I have no real intention of putting a spanner in your works, All along I have just tried to give some balance to your rose tinted view, and up until now I have not been far wrong. You keep flogging your flawed arguments, I have tried to point out the real issues and have just received abuse.'"


'All along I have just tried to give some balance to your rose tinted view, and up until now I have not been far wrong'

What a load of rubbish, the one thing that you've not shown, ever on this subject is balance. You have never seen any of the benefits of the development or advantages that this could bring to a City like Wakefield and to be honest, I don't think you have ever wanted to. People that bring a balanced point of view,don't just pop up when their is bad news or no news, which is what you've done, and put the boot in.I don't know what your angle has been in all this but you've always come over as a NIMBY yourself, nothing more nothing less.

18 posts in 2 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, PopTart , kinleycat , Wildthing
18 posts in 2 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, PopTart , kinleycat , Wildthing



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


8.103515625:10
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
5m
Transfer Talk V5
chapylad
510
8m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
Trebor1
2608
9m
Spirit of the Rhinos
chapylad
6
18m
2025 Recruitment
Highlander
208
21m
Film game
karetaker
5757
22m
Fixtures
Deadcowboys1
1
52m
How many games will we win
PopTart
46
56m
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
Recent
Rumours and signings v9
Mark_P1973
28902
Recent
Salford
karetaker
54
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
28s
Fixtures
Deadcowboys1
1
39s
How many games will we win
PopTart
46
50s
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
MjM
21
51s
Rumours and signings v9
Mark_P1973
28902
52s
Salford
karetaker
54
1m
Film game
karetaker
5757
1m
Planning for next season
Bent&Bon
184
2m
Castleford sack Lingard
Another Cas
16
2m
IMG Score
Bull Mania
83
2m
Spirit of the Rhinos
chapylad
6
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Fixtures
Deadcowboys1
1
TODAY
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
2025 Fixtures
Jemmo
1
TODAY
2025 Squad
Sadfish
1
TODAY
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Mark_P1973
8
TODAY
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
9
TODAY
Spirit of the Rhinos
chapylad
6
TODAY
Mike Ogunwole
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Bailey Dawson
Wanderer
1
TODAY
2024
REDWHITEANDB
14
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
PopTart
46
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
Bent&Bon
6
TODAY
Catalan Away
Dannyboywt1
6
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
POSTSONLINEREGISTRATIONSRECORD
19.65M 1,820 80,15614,103
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.

When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
RLFANS Match Centre
 Thu 13th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
20:00
Wigan
v
Leigh
 Fri 14th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
20:00
Hull KR
v
Castleford
20:00
Catalans
v
Hull FC
 Sat 15th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
15:00
Leeds
v
Wakefield
17:30
St.Helens
v
Salford
 Sun 16th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
15:00
Huddersfield
v
Warrington
 Thu 20th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
20:00
Wakefield
v
Hull KR
 Fri 21st Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
20:00
Warrington
v
Catalans
20:00
Hull FC
v
Wigan
 Sat 22nd Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
15:00
Salford
v
Leeds
20:00
Castleford
v
St.Helens
 Sun 23rd Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
14:30
Leigh
v
Huddersfield
 Sun 2nd Mar 2025
     National Rugby League 2024-R1
04:30
Penrith
v
Cronulla
06:30
Canberra
v
NZ Warriors
 Thu 6th Mar 2025
     National Rugby League 2024-R1
09:00
Sydney
v
Brisbane
     Mens Super League XXX-R3
20:00
Hull FC
v
Leigh
 Fri 7th Mar 2025
     National Rugby League 2024-R1
07:00
Wests
v
Newcastle
09:00
Dolphins
v
Souths
     Mens Super League XXX-R3
20:00
Castleford
v
Salford
20:00
St.Helens
v
Hull KR
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds-Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield-Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
SL
20:00
St.Helens-Hull KR
Sat 8th Mar
SL
17:30
Catalans-Leeds
Sun 9th Mar
SL
17:30
Warrington-Wakefield
SL
17:30
Wigan-Huddersfield
Thu 20th Mar
SL
20:00
Salford-Huddersfield
Fri 21st Mar
SL
20:00
St.Helens-Warrington
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
5m
Transfer Talk V5
chapylad
510
8m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
Trebor1
2608
9m
Spirit of the Rhinos
chapylad
6
18m
2025 Recruitment
Highlander
208
21m
Film game
karetaker
5757
22m
Fixtures
Deadcowboys1
1
52m
How many games will we win
PopTart
46
56m
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
Recent
Rumours and signings v9
Mark_P1973
28902
Recent
Salford
karetaker
54
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
28s
Fixtures
Deadcowboys1
1
39s
How many games will we win
PopTart
46
50s
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
MjM
21
51s
Rumours and signings v9
Mark_P1973
28902
52s
Salford
karetaker
54
1m
Film game
karetaker
5757
1m
Planning for next season
Bent&Bon
184
2m
Castleford sack Lingard
Another Cas
16
2m
IMG Score
Bull Mania
83
2m
Spirit of the Rhinos
chapylad
6
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Fixtures
Deadcowboys1
1
TODAY
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
2025 Fixtures
Jemmo
1
TODAY
2025 Squad
Sadfish
1
TODAY
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Mark_P1973
8
TODAY
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
9
TODAY
Spirit of the Rhinos
chapylad
6
TODAY
Mike Ogunwole
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Bailey Dawson
Wanderer
1
TODAY
2024
REDWHITEANDB
14
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
PopTart
46
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
Bent&Bon
6
TODAY
Catalan Away
Dannyboywt1
6
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!