If Danny Brough is the answer, what is the question?

I posted several weeks ago that Brough had told Shudds players he had signed for us seems this might have been on the cards then and adds credence to this latest version!!

Finn's upside was that he fitted in nicely with the club at all levels. Iffy early years but matured into a grown up.

I meant on the playing side.

‘If you could sign one player that might undo all the good work that has been carried out over the last three seasons who would it be?’

He isn’t as good at that anymore either.

Zac?

Brough may have a greater upside than Finn in your opinion. However, he has a much, much bigger downside as well, in my opinion.

Na not somwhere i go now esp with how they treat people

As anyone not thought brough may of changed his attitude as hes got older

It would be a calculated risk the club and coaching staff would be prepared to take to move us to the next level. On the playing side I still believe he can bring a quality we do not currently have. Some serious man management required to deal with him though. The upsetting the camp bit I don't really buy into to a greater level, its never as happy as you think it is from the outside. 30 egos competing for 17 shirts will never be without problems.

MC and CC know what they're doing with recruitment, I'll back whichever decision they make.

EDIT: Also, I suspect there isn't a plethora of half backs available and we need cover. That's presuming the Reynolds signing is not happening....

The same Danny Brough that got sent home by from the world cup by Scotland early less than a year ago you mean?

Yes I have and that's why I've come to my conclusion FWIW.