Of all the subjects i have seen on this forum this is the biggest load of rubbish, it makes me wonder if the OP has an agenda or is only happy if the Club is going backwards?

I am not an expert on the behind the scenes going on at the club like Fat Faced Fan but i do know somebody at the Club and have, like most been coming to Wakey for 30 years and have seen and spoken to James many times.

Anybody who knows James or witnesses his work will tell you that this man lives Trinity 24 hours a day, if you go to any acadamy, reserve or first team game he is there. The OP questioned his experience, i understand in addition to being CEO at another Superleague club (Hull KR) he has worked in various departments including Community, marketing, commercial and as a player - i would say that is a good allround experience to run the club.

He did not appoint Agar by himself as they have publicly stated it was done with Glover over many weeks and they interviewed many candiadtes. He was also the person that brought Glover to the club in the first place and i undersatnd other investors (steve Kitterick) since.

He is an excellent communicator in the Media and have seen first hand his matchday hosting in the restaraunt in the flats, when the club was in its darkest days he was the one who the old board would send out to face the firing squad.

We will not always agree with things like selctions ect that is why we are fans after all and we are all entitled to our opinions but i genuinely belive we are on the verge of something and with a new team just have to be a bit realistic in our expectations and put our energys in to backing the Club and not putting it down all the time, just remember what hurdles we have overcome in the last 12 months.

Biggest nistake made was to give Agar a 3 year contract. He should have been given a one year deal to see how he performed. Lets face it he had no where else to go and would have had to accept it.

i totally agree. it smacks of naivety. yes we want stability, yes we want the same coach for three years, but only if he's performing. it’s also inconsisten with how we're operating elsewhere; look at the smith signing, he’s got nowhere else to go, we’ve given him a chance to show his worth, with minimal risk to us. why not the same for a head coach who probably wouldn't get a gig elsewhere?

You're obviously a big fan of JE and RA, also you also are being naive.
The fact is that our club survived by the skin of its teeth 12 months ago and achieved a SL licence by the skin of its teeth.
As fans, we love the club and would do anything to see it prosper.
However, as a future coach, the situation is that we are pretty much at the bottom of the pile and as such we would struggle to entice the very best players or coaches to our club.
No doubt, we ARE on the up and when there are more tangible signs of growth and stability, we will be in a better position to attract a different level of player.
We have a significantly stronger playing staff than last term and that is down to the hard work of Mr Glover plus, the 2 people that you seem to have a problem with.
Everybody would like us to have played 6 and won 6, but this was never going to happen.

If we had given RA a 12 month deal and then have a great season, do you think the only knock on his door would be from our guys offreing to extend his contract ?
Get real and SUPPORT the club.

the fact that club survived in the top flight by the skin of its teeth is not lost on me. however i fail to see why that fact alone invalidates the points that i and other have put forward.

agar did nothing at hull to warrant a 3 year deal, a one year deal which could have been upgraded at any point should he be doing well is clearly more favourable than what we've done.

to suggest that i don't support the club shows the limit of your appetite for debate and discussion.

The inferrance that you dont support the club is purely because, after just 5 games, you are having a go at JE and RA and not supporting them.
A 1 year contract for any coach would not encourage them to come to any club, unless it was someone new to coaching, who was trying to prove themselves and although there may have been this type of candidate, I dont think RA falls into that group at all.
We need stability and some growth before we can recruit marquee players, so for this season we go with what we have and look to improve during each of the 3 seasons within the franchise period.
If the fans support the management, coaching staff and players they will perform better that if they are constantly getting grief form all quarters.

i am not having a go at either james elston or richard agar. i am merely playing through a possible and not totally unrealistic scenario. much in the same way we do when we say, if warrington get a good lead in the first 50 minutes on sunday i see no way back for us.

richard agar was not exactly in demand, what do you suppose his other options were? humour me.

i don't think that either agar or elston are getting any grief of any size on here. i do think however that it will come pretty quickly for agar should results continue in the same manner as they are doing. the players seem well motivated and confident despite our run of losses, if we lose the next two or three games then i think morale will suffer in the squad and on the terraces too.

i too see some big improvements in the club, but to pretend that blind faith in the club and it's employees (of which elston and agar are two) is the way we're going to get the best for wakefield trinity would suggest you've forgotten how we got in this position in the first place.

like all trinity fans i want the best for the club, and for the supporters. at least we can agree on that?

Absolutely agree, together we ARE stronger

My memory must not be what I thought because I seem to remember Pearson had already relieved Agar of his coaching duties at Hull and his career over there was hanging by a thread. I also remember every other SL club had got their man and the only SL coaching job open was at wakey. It was a buyers market and if Agar wanted another SL job he could have had the choice of us or the dole.

Lets face it he hardly had a good track record. A one year 'probationary' deal was the way to go.

Obviously he is highly thought of by Messers Glover & Elston. Maybe you should ask them why, although I i've said, it certainly gives a level of stability to the club, which is better than chopping and changing.

Well if all we're doing is exploring hypothetical situations, errrrr... he could have taken that director of rugby job that Adam Pearson allegedly didn't offer him when he told the world that Agar wouldn't be leaving Hull FC for Wakefield... he still had another year of his contract to run.

OK I see your point. Also like you I want the best for the club so lets hope that come the end of the season we don't have to chop and change to move forward.