After 4 or 5 pages of optimism on this thread from the Wildcats fans prior to the game about how they were gonna win


We then got this whoppa from snowie very early into the first half

Wildcats 18 Whinos 34 was the final score snowie

Why not go the whole hog Chinny and say; Wildcats18 =#FF0000Loiners 34, and be really up to date?

You’ve been crying like a spoilt child for weeks now and one win and you’re on here gloating. Says a lot about you.

Correct...and then they wonder why they are despised so much by the rest of the West Yorkshire supporters...they make by blood boil

As said could not make the St game but my son said they played well ,then a St fan came on here and said we are the first team not to take St on down the middle and we tired them out in the second half .So it must mean we threw the ball about

I think much of Leeds fluid passing had a great deal to do with a seasoned coach realising two SRs at centre was a big error. Especially when you have two smart HB’s.

I’m not sure we could have won even if we had two real centres but Leeds would have found it hard going.

I’ve seen the Saints game and our passing was better than anything Leeds managed but Saints just hung on defensively as some of their fans have testified on here.

You missed a treat tbh despite it being a loss

Just can't afford to throw any more than my current £75 to our "Friends (?)" at SKY, vasty, and currently my 4 year old great granddaughter insists that I pay for the Peppa Pig and Spongebob channels, hence no SKY sports and Superleague. From What I read on here about the SKY coverage though I'm better off sticking with Peppa. I'm just pleased That Channel 4 are now chipping in.

Do not think Wakefield are in S L as far as the Sky pundits are concerned.I got Sky but it's more for the Australian R L no it's not every body's choice ,but a least the pundits talk about what is happening in the game and do not give a biase comantry. Because Wakefield scored 18 points in the second half the Sky pundits said it was a very scrappy half .But the week before in the same conditions it was down to the weather .Been impressed by C 4 pundits so far

Agree with you re Channel 4 Legend, quite a professional job so far.

Make your blood boil? Control your emotions.

I normally agree with you Fil but if we'd won there would have been plenty from our board crowing on theirs.
I think we got off lightly.
Winners are grinners I'm afraid.

If you want proof that referees get things wrong watch the game again. When Leeming goes for the forty-twenty Tom bats it back inside. It was given as a forty-twenty but if you slow it down you'll see that TJ gets his hand to it before he lands in touch. A point picked up by the often maligned Phill Clarke.

If you want proof that referees get things wrong watch the game again. When Leeming goes for the forty-twenty Tom bats it back inside. It was given as a forty-twenty but if you slow it down you'll see that TJ gets his hand to it before he lands in touch. A point picked up by the often maligned Phill Clarke.

Sorry about the double post. Having computer problems at the mo.

There is no doubt refs make mistakes. They are only human.
As are touch judges who make the 40-20 decision in some ways.

I don't really have a problem with it. I want them to work hard to reduce it and I want them to have tech to help them but no one is perfect.

The thing is, on this occasion they had tech to help them but never considered using it.

Yeah! Noticed that myself on Super League Show last night TP. TJ was still in play when he palmed the ball back.

I stand to be corrected but I thought the ball hit the line before Tom made contact with it and the line is out isn't it ??

The ball hit the line just before Tom touched it, shown clearly by a closer analysis during the post game chit chat. Did take a frame by frame replay to confirm that the officials got the decision correct though.

I guess that this is aimed at me?



PopTart you are a very good and fair moderator pal

I have been guilty of having some banter on here guys, and that is all it is as I actually have a bit of a soft spot for Wakey.
I actually go to plenty of games in the hospitality with a club sponsor that I know. (I probable see more "Wildcats" home games than the majority of you)
So trust me when I say that nothing is intended to cause any offense guys
I love calling you the Wildcats too as it causes so much fury in the box when I pretend that I'm a newbie fan (The Box sponsor just winks at me every time that I am corrected

)

So, you're not a WUM but a WUW instead, then ??

See the whinos balloon has just popped

The fans are saying Agar must go,

Their fans certainly aren't happy.

That Canberra halfbacks partnership stinks, makes you all the more frustrated with our first half performance now , when England reject Connor opened them up so easily near their line and Hull snuffed out all their attacking plays bar the tail off at the end , lots of hull first teamer’s on the sideline but the youngsters grabbed their chance well , running behind that powerhouse front row . Emphatic and deserved win in the end