But there is no evidence of anyone 'holding up' the takeover.
The lies told about the directors last time were proved to be lies.

So forgive me for not believing this one.

The owner shareholders have all said they are happy to transfer ownership, pending the due diligence process.

has a letter gone out to them all asking this ?

What?
They are in negotiations with the person who wants to buy.
And he said in the press they all agree to sell/transfer.

Who would be sending a letter? And why the need to challenge it?

Even the post on RW&B has been locked, and thar hardly ever happens, so that should show how believable it is.

We must really be doing well for people to work so hard to put the club down.

The director shares and new stand rights were wrong, why should we believe this.

were they realy wrong. Believe whst you want, like me, loathe me, agree or disagree with me but il stand up for my club and the fans, this deal goes under and someone Is picking this massive debt up which is left. All that as to be done is let the deal go through

The reason I am asking is that I can name one person on that list who has never been asked if he agrees and accepts the takeover. However if he was asked I am sure he would not mind. So it's not an entirely true statement is it.

Also those people are only member share holders, they have no legal influence and it matters not what they agree or disagree with. So it just sames a strange thing for Minards to comment on.

Anyhow, let's hope it all goes through. We need a fresh start and right now have a board who may have the clubs interest at heart but do not have the resources to push the club to the next level. Roll on Matt Ellis.

When you say, people on the list, you mean the owners?

Yes. Because it was said they were holding things up because they wanted rent for the stand and were wanting their loans paid.
Both of which have been proved to be false.

And 'just letting the deal go through' is what got us Pearman.

Why not just let the people who know what they are doing on both sides, with lawyers and accountants, sort it out.

I was talking about the list of Member shareholders that has recently materialised and I am presuming that Minards has asked each and everyone of them if they agree with the takeover.

If it's the real shareholders, then as far as I am aware everyone is up for the deal, bar John Minards. Who may infarct be up for the takeover but on his terms.

They don't hold voting shares. They will stay members.

Yes I know

Nothing was proved to be false, like I said earlier your very selective who you call a liar

The title of the thread is takeover updates and it seems updates are not available at present.
Four weeks have come and gone so some sort of statement would either confirm or rubbish things, unless some solid evidence cane be made available

I'd be very careful in what you say and others (may already be too late), because there is one person biding their time, they think that they have a strong case, to have the 'last laugh'.

Just letting the deal to Pearman .
didnt happen. this was brought about democratically from memoury
proposed by Rodey Walker and from memoury seconded by Hinchcliff ? at a Agm then voted upon .As all the shares had equal voting as Ted allways said.
If these shares had been issued along the same lines how many more shares
would have been sold Salford. style
and not this bogus share issue

The same Salford that are now rumoured to be in dire financial straits ???

How can it be bogus?
The people handing their money over, knew exactly why (I hope) and so did the club accepting their hard earned. I'm sure that any shareholder who was not happy, would have been given their money back.

Of course it has. The stand doesn't belong to them so they couldn't be charging rent.
Try again.

Just to go off topic again, love their music.

Them were the days



trip down memory lane there.
But you do make a good point. I thought Salford did a great job and the amount they raised very impressive for a club no bigger, probably smaller than us.

And good due diligence like is happening now would have stopped that.

I thought the stand belonged to Spirit 1873, am I mistaken

Knowbody knows the truth in what is happening so dont get why people pretend to know,i personally got told that it had been finalised and gone through but i guess not.i would also say and i maybe totally wrong i dont know nothing in matters like this but wouldnt deals of a takeover have to be completed before due dilligence starts?