Consecutive 'attempts', he chooses when to attempt. If he declined a kick because he had a twinge in his calf or he had run 100 metres to score and let Rocky take the kick, then would it be the end of the run? -I think not.

I’m sure plenty have kicked 10 consecutive before PT. He’s done it three times over so far.

Well spotted TH

I'm I reading this correctly what you've posted or have you been letting the lids on your computer

No problem then.
World record here we come.

Let’s hope he can plant 10 more over. Would be great to have a record beaten to shout about.

It simply means we need to score 11 try’s in our next 2 games if there’s any chance of doing it (this season).

That would be nice!

Last away game at Leigh. I’ll be there!

And always take the 2

Do penalties count or is it just conversions?

Both count

Highly possible then with a few kickable penalties. If he doesn’t then no great loss.

It's the run of the goal attempts of the team.

If a player does not take a kick, his run ends, whether his next kick is successful or not.

I don't recall the exact rule on missing (not playing), a game within the run though.

We haven’t appeared to be taking many penalty shots at goal preferring to run it.

I noticed that. I assume it’s based on the time left and our perceived ability to hold a small lead.

Well if that breaks the run then he's only on 22, as he missed the Huddersfield away game on 8th August

The recent options do seem to be pretty clear cut though and I can't say have I have disagreed with many, if any.

We did seem to refuse a lot of take the twos under Chester with that one home v Leeds in the pouring rain in 2019 for ever in my memory. Leeds took theirs 5 minutes later and kept an narrow lead throughout a dour game.

Then again still remember Finn going for two and failing to even reach dead that gave Saints the ball for the last 3 minutes and Grix the stage for his infamous brain fart. Probably Kear's decision.