|
| |
 |
|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 858 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2018 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Dec 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Interesting, " a player must keep control & possession of the ball, it is down to him to secure the ball when in possession" If thee ball separates control is deemed as lost even if he regathers before it hits the floor especially if the ball moves forward. This also applies in field or if over the line !!! This happened/occured by hull upon their first try - - No doubt about it , however if the ref rules different acting against the rules then that's the dispute, refs can never be held of bringing the game into disrepute !!! Coupled to these points, if losing the ball in that fashion, then a player should be enabled to toss the ball in the air above players head & then move around defenders catch the ball move forward & score ! Weirdly according to this ref ! Note that in the saints match a player headed the ball forward & scored which was given, & is against the rules, All down to the referee again !!
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 858 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2018 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Dec 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Further point at issue, the last try of hulls was a try to me, however, the scorer was on side, the centre was in front of the kicker, He then was inside the 10m zone, the ref never went to the video, that does not bother me, only inconsistency which can be interpreted as a bias etc lack of transparency !
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 990 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The promise of a VR at every match hasn't quite worked has it, with fewer camera angles for the games on sky plus, creating once again a inconsistent view of all games.
We had better after match coverage in the Championship than we do in Supa Dupa league, and that was without a TV contract, and I pay enough for Sky without the extra for SL+.
On a side note, has the forward pass rule been amended because a lot have been let go this year, us included.
| | |
 | |
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2025 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
|
|
|
|