Good to see the lads respond with some effort which was so lacking last week.

However, despite the improved effort, which most weeks you can’t fault, you cannot get away from the fact that it was another frustratingly dull spectacle of rugby league from a Wakey perspective with the BBC commentary team struggling to find anything remotely half decent to say about our play.

So, it’s another post mortem…

In defence we didn’t get outstripped on the outside like we did last week but instead of getting off the line to get into the Catalans faces and hit runners as soon as possible, we reverted to the same old move up and then hesitate momentarily allowing opposition runners to gain momentum. We also played with a defensive line like a dog’s hind leg when our wingers and centres should be pushing up creating an umbrella to close down plays and force traffic down the middle of the park.

With ball in hand we were better than last week but that is not saying much because still too many basic handling errors and coughing up possession in areas of the field off the back of which Catalans scored tries. The cluelessness in attack which has been characteristic of performances over the last couple of years was on display yet again today. Of the 15 or so sets we had in the first half, many turned out to be one pass from the dummy half for 3-4 tackles in a set with no decoy runners so real easy reads for the Catalans defence. No footwork from our forwards just before they hit the defensive line. Most times we were taking the ball static and not running onto the ball and I can’t recall us bringing any men back on the inside. On the few occasions when we did look to shift the ball, we looked threatening but we seem unable to string together more than one of those wide passing plays in a set of six. The kicking was better this week with Hampshire putting in a couple of deft kicks leading to tries but still too many poor ends to sets. There was more of the same on show in the second half and Catalans did what Wigan did against us a few weeks back – made errors, took the foot off the gas when the game was already over as a contest and gave us some consolation scores.

I don’t buy into comments after the last Catalans game that the forwards aren’t up to it or that there are a number of journeymen or the team is not good enough. The squad of players which has been assembled has got the ability to perform. We have retained the nucleus of the squad which achieved 2 top 5 finishes and the players brought in over the last couple of years have been upgrades on the outgoings. What I am struggling to understand is why the attacking players we have brought in seem to lose the ability to play. The strong running Tanginoa who busted tackles at will when he first joined us has disappeared. The ball handling loose Westerman no longer seems to have a pass in him. The young dynamic attacking Alex Walker who was a regular at London no longer gets picked and when he does he is a shadow of his former self. I could go on.

The attacking structures need sorting out fast. Chester waxes lyrical about the performances of Gutherson at the Eels so how about looking at how not just Parramatta but all the other NRL teams set up, particularly in attack. If our attacking play does not change over this extended pre-season then knock on Danny Ward’s door. He had London playing attacking rugby on limited resources with a far less star studded roster than we had when playing in super league so with that experience he would be best placed to turn things around but would he want to come and what would a Chester pay off look like.

In the offseason, or when the NRL season finishes, the priority for recruitment has to be to get in an organising half. Brough was a gamble/experiment which was a disaster and has set us back considerably after our top 5 finishes. Maloney with Drinkwater ran the show for Catalans today and showed us exactly what is missing within our ranks. Although Miller was much improved on last week, he showed again that he is a running half and not the organising half who we desperately need. If Fifita is joining Catalans as is rumoured then use the money to pick up an organiser asap to structure our play when we have ball in hand.

Because there’s no end product from Miller and he doesn’t have as much to his game as other half backs. Yes he’s a fit bloke and looks busy but there’s not a single half back trait in anything he does.
No passing game, no vision, no kicking game, no creativity, he doesn’t open up defences, his decision making is awful when picking his passes, I could go on.

And seriously, you’re comparing Miller with Hastings and Austin?

I’ve nothing against Miller despite not rating him, he’s probably a great bloke who works hard and does his best but he’s nowhere near good enough as a First Choice Half at SL Level.

They don’t watch the dross we serve up week in week out do they

It’s actually 25 losses from the last 30 games v SL opposition, a 16.66% win ratio over 30 games!

I certainly don't celebrate defeat I'm one of the worst losers ever but some of the posts really annoy me. Players get slagged off whatever number shirt they are cos they can't create can't tackle their too slow too fat too old the coach is crap the backroom staff are useless the conditioner is rubbish need I go on. Maybe its how I perceive these posts but surely there are positives somewhere, and I'm sure some of our players are quite good.

Well I will answer the question about Miller The reason he does not luck as good as he should is simple Mr Chester should have spent most of this year's budget on a Quality scrum half and hooker to give him more space on the field .The number of times he was hit late be Wigan players .because we had no more options on the park .We are way behind clubs in these position ..Phil Clark said in commentary he through we were the only team in S L that did not use our full back as a extra attacker You can see why Miller does not look as good as he could do .And Clarke comment sums up the coaching for me

It's the inevitable consequence of a terrible win loss ratio that also includes being nilled. I think the point is many of them are quite good, which only compounds the problem