I don't think there was any malice or intent to injure, but it was completely unnecessary and considering previous incidents extremely reckless so deserved to be punished. Taking Arona incident on board he was only banned because the scouse mong Cunnigham whined about it (much like Powell in round one).
Don't care what the disciplinary panel say ...when I saw it live I thought it was bad and the video confirms it. How the plankton at the rfl can give arena 2 matches for a perfectly legal tackle and not punish this beggars belief. Didn't they state something about duty of care regarding the arona tackle? How is leaving the initial tackle to attack the leg of a stationary opponent legal? This decision just feeds my paranoia along with some of the refereeing we have had to endure this season.... the rfl are either out to get us , incompetent or both.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
