When we have 2 projects at centre and 2 at fullback why have we signed him? Really cannot understand it. He is poor in defence and average in attack.

Showed a bit if promise as a younger player but very average.

I'd be going for Tom Briscoe.

Didn't realise we had signed him?

Have we definitely signed him?

I agree he showed al lot of promise a couple of years ago when he was breaking through. It's fair to say he hasn't kicked on but then not many would in the current mess London find themselves in.

If he is coming to us it would be interesting to see how he develops under our staff and systems.

Doesn't solve the full back issue for next year though.

Id this confirmed?

If we have signed him I fully back the club. They have a track record to be proud of they will believe they can help him fulfill his early promise.

He's not kicked on at London but who would?

I agree with that and being coached under the quality of coaches we have should bring him on alot.

I do worry though just how poor he looked.

Defensively he is awful and that has been highlighted in the last two televised games. His read of whats in front of him is often wrong and leaves his team mates inside him exposed. He took his try well last night and came back well on the angle from Sowoods pass but that is nothing I wouldnt expect for a super league player. He should be a long way off a starting jersey if he has signed. Alot of work to do.

Me too!

Sarginson is only twenty years of age. He appears to have the raw talent, he had a superb game for London v Wigan a couple of years ago.
He reminds me very much of Stefan Ratchford in his versatility and running style. As a few have alluded to he looks poor defensively, but he's playing in a very poor side at the moment.
Would he go better with better players around him? Probably.
Is he worth taking a risk on? I would say yes if the salary is right.

I don't see another player in our junior ranks who has that flexibility to play at #1, #3, #4, #6 and #7.

Surely Sam Panapa must have had a son by now...

I don't see how we can judge anyone in that London team, even Soward looked crap against us. Different kettle of fish at Wigan, if we have signed him I'm looking forward to seeing him play for us.

But is that necessary? We have Hampshire and Tierney who can play 1, Gelling, Thornley, Burgess and (at a push) Hughes who can play 3/4, and we have Hampshire, Powell and Williams in the halves. Who cares if no one man covers all of those positions?

Perhaps we will be selling more players so IL can line his pockets.....

the problem defensively isnt that he plays in a poor team. He makes bad reads and leaves his team exposed. That is his choice not one forced on him by his team mates. He needs to learn how to read the game, study the opposition and put that into match practice. Attacking wise he is exciting but he needs educating.