When watching Smith you could see ever so faint sparks of a great player, however those sparks were few and far between, plus his defensive frailties particularaly in the early games of the season were nothing short of shocking. As for hiding his defensive weaknesses I though Gleeson did a good job of it, but in the end the guy didn't do enough offensively to warrant being in the team. I for one will be very interested to see how he goes in the NRL next year, and whether he improves in all area's.

Are people actually arguing in here about people's opinions on a player? Never seen that before!!

If it's someone opinion, it's simply that, how can that be an argument?

I agree. How people can try and defend his performances this season I will never know. Defensively he is the worst RL player I have ever seen. Yes in attack he has a good pass but thats about it. However even at this his good pass is nullified due to the fact that he has no running game at all, and an average kicking game, which thus makes him very predictable. Hopefully after what has happened with Smith, Mathers and Pryce, Lenegan will finally realise that these cheap risky signings are precisely that for a reason.

I LIKED HIM.....

sorry did you say the worst or one of ?

i agree with you tho he was SH~T to the highest standard ! but boy could he pass !

i dont understand your point......could you elaborate please.

do you mean Smiths the worst, or almost the worst, or havnt you seen worse?

That must be one of the worst posts I have seen on here.

I think he is saying he's the worst he's ever seen

so batesys wrong then?

tim smiths not the worst youve seen??

well who is then?

Would like to wish him all the best for the future. Met him a couple of times and is a really nice lad. Good luck.

Jeez.

The state school system has a lot to answer for.

I have answered the question, about 6 times.

If you can't work out simple English, why should I bother answering it again?