I agree totally with this use of the VR for blatant forward passes that lead to tries - fair enough if it is a line call and impossible to be sure because of the various camera angles, but when it is 100% transparent, then surely the VR should be able to make the correct decision.

What was disappointing with the Monaghan try was that Hodgson was clearly a yard one side of the 20 metre line whereas Monaghan caught the ball a couple of yards the other side of the line. How Gansen and the TJ didn't spot that, raises a few questions. Or did Gansen notice it and.....?

tbf coud be judged as momentum but think it was forward. but then again the one from riley to waterhouse that wasn't forward was pulled as waterhouse was walking over the line.

Think they pulled the previous pass as opposed to the one from Riley.

The Hodgson one was a shocker and should have been k

There was at least one previous to that, possibly even another one.

score (skôr, skr)


Slang

The act or an instance of buying illicit drugs.

Ah right I meant the act of scoring a try. Granted it was with a bottle top not a rugby ball but still

We didn't need a Plan B yesterday, we needed the possession and field position to implement Plan A. Too many errors in our own half and poor last tackle kicks meant we hardly got either.

I don't buy that our attack is becoming too predictable at all. When we were at our best we had the deep line with Sam out the back plus runners going in to holes. It obviously can't work everytime as the better defences will read it correctly, but do it enough and it results in tries. We used a similar pattern for Thornley try and that was pretty much the only opportunity we had near their line where the right passes were chosen and executed.

Our attacking plays don't need overhauling, we need to get the basics right so we get enough opportunities to utilise them.

I think our attack is completely predictable. It's always a couple of passes out the back with Sam then running round and stepping, or passing. Every time we had possession yesterday I knew what was going to happen.

I'd agree with that, most team's plan B is look for a bit of individual brilliance from a star player - your star player was well marshalled last night. For me it was Warrington's defence that won them the game as it was against Saints, it was aggressive and meant you could never really settle or get a roll on. Form is a temporary thing though so I wouldn't be crowing them champions just yet

I think that's a cleaar example of momentum as you,ll see. Bert was running full tilt.at he point he released it to Jonas who was well behind him. His hands were.backwards

Backwards? Did you watch it in a mirror?

The replay showed Hodgson's hands releasing the ball forwards. That's why it was so clear cut.

It really isn't! If we set up properly everytime the ball reaches the 2nd receiver there's then an option for the short ball to Hock/Hansen or out the back to Sam, who can then go himself or pass to Goulding/Carmont. If it was so predictable we wouldn't have scored so many points this season. Yesterday wasn't about us being too predictable, it was about us not getting in to positions to put our plays on, and the few opportunities we did the passes weren't sticking.

Correct

It doesn't matter if we had a plan A, B, C or D yesterday, if you continually drop the ball, give away penalties and miss tackles you will get beat when you play a Wire or a Leeds.

We need to go back to basics for these next 6 games and make sure we cut out the silly errors and we will have a great chance of being crowned Champions at OT