What is wrong with an Oz v Oz final or GB v GB one for that matter? If the best two teams in a four team expanded WCC are from one of the two competitions so be it.

Personally I think the way the WCC games have gone over the years suggests it unlikely Oz would dominate this competition in the way they do the Internationals.

www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... le-1338313

www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... le-1338313

That is my take on it too.

i think 4 teams would work - gf winners from one country play league leaders of other country and then the two winners of each game make up final. could end up being oz oz but think theyd be good games.

Whatever the format SL teams will have to be competitve both here and down under. They may be trialing the 1v1, 2v2 etc simply to see how English teams stand up. If we are not competitive then there won't be any future in it.
If our teams won as many as they lost and the comp was found to be worthwhile then I think it would would go with each team playing each other then the final.
First things first, lets see how good we really are and go with what's been suggested.

I'd enjoy watching it for sure. Gives teams an incentive to finish top 3 rather than scrape the 8. Creates a nice little Super League v NRL playoff over a weekend that could be pretty damn marketable if it works. Also even if the games are "Meaningless", if we played Canterbury this weekend, both clubs putting out the strongest side available, would you not want to see that?