Whichever way it goes (current rule) or changed it will always be controversial as one team will feel agreived.

The current rule though is poor - from the replays last night Moore was not in a position where he could have definitevly called a try he was on the opposite side from the ball so I do not see how he could have sent it up as a try. If it is changed it should be ref call a try - end of, or it gets sent up as a no try or a not sure and the video ref makes the final call. Last nights was bad because it materially effected the result and with so much at stake was always going to cause controversy.

Will things change - doubt it, that would be a tacit admission that the current rule is wrong and the RFL would not admit to that.

Should have really capitalised THE. Got me panicking there

This is one of the things that put me off the game

Isn't that what basically happens now, we just have the on-field ref giving his opinion before he asks the VR to review it.

I don't mind the current system even though it may at times cause some discussions, the on-field ref has to be the one in charge of the game and has to give his opinion on what he thought, if there was no VR he would have just awarded the try in the first instance, but we have the technology now to 'check' if he is right or not and in the absence of clear evidence then the on-field decision shuld stand

No, currently the VR has to find conclusive evidence to overturn the refs call. I think the VR should make the decision and only if unable to do so go with the onfield call.

But it is what happens now, if the VR had conclusive evidence he would overturn the on-field decision, if he was unable to do so, then it reverts to the on-field decision, either way you word it, it is the same process, the VR has to be sure otherwise go with the ref.

If you changed to say 'only' the VR could make the call then that would be something different, either the VR finds evidence to say if it was a try or not, or the refs call stands