during and immediately after the match my opinion of Tomkins' performance was pretty shoddy, but having read all of these comments I can see the truth in the arguments in his favour too...
however, he has had 3 seasons or so now working with the likes of MM, TL and MH who are all great hookers in my opinion on their day, but Logan doesn't seem to be picking up off them and never has shown any real potential. he has had many chances to prove his worth but in fairness he hasn't had a good run of games either. Being in for 3 games is all well and good due to a ban but as soon as MM is available again he'll be back in the doldrums and that can't help his progression.
I honestly can't see where he is going to fit in the team over the next few years and as many have said on here, fair play to him, but he just hasn't got enough for Wigan, perhaps even a few lesser teams.
he suffers from being a "Tomkins" yes, but I have always argued that joel was the most talented and had the most potential out of the three anyway. and whether he was a Tomkins or not my opinion of him wouldn't be any different.
hopefully he can put in a couple of good performances but I can't see him shining against Wire - I'd love it to happen though!!
I'm happy to get behind him and give him a chance, I'm just doubtful he can deliver.

he did everything a good hooker should do.....passed, ran and passed, scooted when the chance was there, and tackled anything that moved.
Its a confidence thing. Getting some rare starts is showing the doubters what he can do.
His tackling more text book than big hits, but that will come when he bulks up.
I'm quite happy to let him develop as Maccas understudy, and one day i reckon the roles will reverse

his best game , in my humble opinion , was against widnes last year when he was unlucky not to get MOM

not convinced by tomkins at all. i think he has been given more of a chance than others purely because his name is tomkins. when watching him i just feel like any other player could probably do exactly the same job. All he literally does is pass and tackle. he rarely creates anything!

I was impressed by him this week and definately ahead in the pecking order over Powell as back up to MM. Powell's distribution off the floor was poor agaoinst Hudds, taking a step before passing most of the time, and not in a way to draw the marker. Logan is off the floor first time and accurate with it. Not in ths same league as MM but definately capable perform to decent standard so MM can be spelled or rotated.

I'm always wary of criticising young front rowers. They often need more time to develop. IMO he's probably where MM was at his age. We'll have to wait and see if he keeps improving.